A few interesting side-bars from the short Congressional heating on UFOs [UAP]
Copyright 2022, InterAmerica, Inc.
That the U.S. Navy was the real source for early UFO information and their involvement in UFOs was brought forward by me years ago.
But my UFO pals – Tony Bragalia, Kevin Randle. Paul Kimball, Nick Redfern et al. --ignored my insinuation, all but Theo Paijmans (European UFO notable) did not pursue my suggestive recommendation to pursue the Navy angle,.
Even, now they are not prone to seek out the Navy’s thrust into UFOs as far back as 1945.
My info, collected for Theo, can be found in the search boxes of several of my UFO blogs.
RR
posted by RRRGroup at
Tuesday, May 17, 2022
2 Comments:
"The move to 'closed session' about what was detected underwater during surveys for UAP . . ."
That's intriguing. The Navy is particularly sensitive about anything related to submarine tracking tech, so it's understandable they'd want to keep that classified. You've noticed of course that with all the talk about the Navy encounters over the years, it's always been about Navy pilots and aircraft, and hardly a word about what was going on under water at the same time.
Has the USAF been held to task at all, or is Congress letting them skate away again?
By
Ron, at Tuesday, May 17, 2022
The silence from the AF, Ron, is deafening.
And the Army, that was in on very early UFO events -- The 1942 California fracas and Roswell -- staying quiet, is interesting.
But my UFO buddies all have their own eggs to fry and have never taken time to pursue the other military agencies' UFO involvement, other than the AF, mostly because of Blue Book.
Shame on them!
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Tuesday, May 17, 2022
Post a Comment
<< Home