History [and UFO reports] have been Fictive from the very Beginning?
“Fake news” is not new.
Ancient events were turned into fictive, myth-generating
stories at the outset of oral and recorded accounts by primitive mankind.
A book I just received, The Story of Writing; Alphabets,
Hieroglyphs, & Pictograms (Second Edition) by Andrew Robinson [Thames
& Hudson, London, 1995/2007] had this:
“ … there is … a dark side to the spread of writing that is
present throughout its history … Writing has been used to tell lies, as well as
truth … to make minds lazy as well as to stretch them.” [Page 8]
“Socrates … writing in his story of the Egyptian god Thoth,
the inventor of writing, who [was told by a king] … You have invented an elixir
not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of
wisdom … when they will seem to know many things, but are for the most part
ignorant.” [Page 8]
We all know (or should) that Homer’s account of the Trojan
War, in The Iliad and Odysseus, became laden with accretions over
the course of its (oral) telling, ending up fraught with extraneous
exaggerations and amendments when set down:
“In antiquity, the Greeks applied the Iliad and the Odyssey
as the bases of pedagogy. Literature was central to the educational-cultural
function of the itinerant rhapsode, who composed consistent epic poems
from memory and improvisation, and disseminated them, via song and chant...
Venetus A, copied in the 10th century AD, is the
oldest fully extant manuscript of the Iliad.”
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad]
And we know that The Hebrew Bible (The Holy Bible
of Christians also) is a compilation of legends, not reportage, per se, [source Ginzberg] as are the mythical tales of the Greeks, and all other
cultures of early mankind.
What is this penchant for elaboration or exaggerated
representation that men and women need to indulge in?
(The Creative Ice Age Brain: Cave Art in the Light of
Neuroscience by Barbara Olins Alpert , noted earlier here, seems to
indicate that cave art, a form of “history writing,” shows reality as it was
perceived by Neolithic man, but that’s not the case at all. Cave art, like
writing or the oral tradition of history, is also encumbered by alterations of
reality, as is art throughout the ages.)
It seems that all accounts of events, including news
accounts, are marred by biases of memory or design.
Humans are seemingly flawed when it comes to relating
events, even those they are privy to.
There are reasons for this, which I won’t go into right now,
but we can assume that UFO reports that have accumulated over the years, in the
modern era also, are replete with errant information.
Yes, people try to report their sightings and experiences
correctly, but they can’t. The process for “reportage” is flummoxed by an
inherent human flaw in its story-telling.
So, UFO buffs need to step back and take
UFO accounts with a grain of salt.
What is the truth of things? We can never really know, can
we?
RR


2 Comments:
Something more about false memories that may interest you (have not read it fully myself yet):
http://michaelprescott.typepad.com/michael_prescotts_blog/2016/12/lest-we-forget.html
By
Anonymous, at Saturday, December 31, 2016
Thank you Dave...
Michael's postings are always edifying.
(I've covered the vicissitudes of memory many times here, and will do so in 2017 also. It's a fascinating topic.)
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, December 31, 2016
Post a Comment
<< Home