The UFO Gospel and its Ministers
A piece on Kirk Franklin, a noted gospel performer, in The
New Yorker for January 16, 2017 [Making God Famous by Vinson Cunningham,
Page 26 ff.] caught my attention when Franklin was quoted saying (from an NPR
interview) “My job on earth, the reason why Kirk is created, is to make God
famous. I just want God to be well known. …
“Christianity, and the framework of religion, makes us a
subculture.” [Page 31]
If I substitute “UFOs”” for God and ufology” for
Christianity in those quotes, I have the raison d’être of some
significant people (and lesser lights) in the UFO community.
I’m talking about the proselytizers, Stanton Friedman, for
instance, and the slew of UFO buffs who hawk UFOs as if the phenomenon is
divine or near divine, and I’m not just talking about the ETH crowd.
(Even my lame agnostic views about UFOs could be lumped into
the desire to make UFOs “famous” – sort of like a left-handed compliment.)
Franklin, the performer, is advocating his belief system by
staging concerts and hobnobbing with rappers and hip-hoppers.
Ufologists hobnob with fellow ufologists, at conferences, by using web-sites, blogs, and writing books.
The desire is self-gratifying. If UFOs (or God) is made to
be important, then the person(s) advocating them are important too.
But it’s not just that.
It’s a need, a desire, to raise UFOs (or God) to the top of
the societal zeitgeist, to give precedence to something that needs elevation in
some of humanities’ quarters.
Now, God, not so much, but UFOs? Certainly.
The UFO topic (and “reality”) are abased by sane, sensible
members of society and some wish those who think lowly of UFOs to like them
(worship them) as much as ufologists do.
The task is daunting, like Sisyphus and his eternal plight,
but nonetheless it is as necessary as it is for Franklin and other
God-believers, to deliver their Gospel.
UFOs are an intellectual blight, just as God is a blight to
atheists.
Someone has to take up and throw down the gauntlet for both
God and UFOs.
In the UFO community, we have many trying to do so. That
they are inept is not the fault of the phenomenon, but the laissez faire
of those pushing the belief in UFOs; they are unskilled and sloppy,
inarticulate, and too ready to foist nonsense on their hoped-for audience.
Let them take a lesson from God-believers like Kirk
Franklin, who said “that he always craved attention and approval …”:
Be evangelical but judicious, and spread the word about UFOs
with cunning and truths.
That will make UFOs famous, at least for a while.
RR



2 Comments:
...and now you know why I wrote that article on the Raelians whereby we were introduced; the initial intuition was that UFOs inspire a "cultic" behaviour, and the question was "why?" and then to describe it...
By
Bryan Sentes, at Tuesday, January 17, 2017
But the Raelians, Bryan, may be likened to a sub-sub-set of ufology, much like the Dominionists or Chalcedonians; that is, they (the Raelians) don't represent "mainstream" ufology, but are, indeed a cult.
I'm writing about those who seem "normal" (sensible, somewhat) to UFO buffs. those who speak for the UFO community or seem to.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Post a Comment
<< Home