Important for those who think that UFO scrutiny of U.S. nuclear assets is some historical fairly tale and never really happened. Wrong. Also important because the observational data supports the notion that the scrutiny was cyclical; intense in the early years and then dormant for decades. If this can't get Congressional attention, what can?
It could be something as "simple" as threat awareness, gauging how much of a threat our atomic weapons pose to them, not other humans. Not a big jump to go from curiosity to fear -- and you can make the argument that each time the encounters spiked and then fell, they didn't feel particularly threatened. As Cox mentions, if it was human doing then you'd expect full-time surveillance, not spotty.
Rich, there are always questions that no one can answer. But clues are clues. Notice, no one has ever documented increased UFO scrutiny of, say, baseball games. But the most destructive weapons on the planet get special attention from unknown flying machines. So that they can be neutralized and with ICBM's, taken off line? Clues are clues. Draw your own conclusions.
Yes, Dom, one would, sensibly, arrive at your reasoning, but that's human reasoning.
UFOs, as I've often conjectured, might be AI machines looking at nuclear facilities as a conglomeration of fellow AI beings or technical "brothers" and "sisters."
Or those inside the UFOs are fascinated by the machinery, and have no idea what they are intended for.
You (and others) are jumping to human conclusions.
And so, Ron, there are a multiplicity of possibilities, not just that which comes from human anxiety or the push by those who can only see one avenue for UFO curiosity.
And the supposed surge of UFO scrutiny of water or volcanoes or cows cannot be overlooked as a reasoned observation of things odd to "outsiders."
Clues can be clues or diversions, as Sherlock's creator and Columbo's writers tried to make clear with their fictions.
Atomic substance might be interesting to others....there are a number of reasons UFOs gather at facilities housing missiles or other advanced technology.
I wonder what's so interesting about us that would attract such attention. Cracking the atom might mean something in the galactic pecking order. Or . . .
I'll repeat this musing: do other worlds have their own UFOs?
7 Comments:
Important for those who think that UFO scrutiny of U.S. nuclear assets is some historical fairly tale and never really happened. Wrong. Also important because the observational data supports the notion that the scrutiny was cyclical; intense in the early years and then dormant for decades. If this can't get Congressional attention, what can?
By
Dominick, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
But Dominick (and Billy), what exactly were the alleged UFOs looking for or at in the nuclear facilities?
That's a question no one answers or can....
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
It could be something as "simple" as threat awareness, gauging how much of a threat our atomic weapons pose to them, not other humans. Not a big jump to go from curiosity to fear -- and you can make the argument that each time the encounters spiked and then fell, they didn't feel particularly threatened. As Cox mentions, if it was human doing then you'd expect full-time surveillance, not spotty.
By
Ron, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
Rich, there are always questions that no one can answer. But clues are clues. Notice, no one has ever documented increased UFO scrutiny of, say, baseball games. But the most destructive weapons on the planet get special attention from unknown flying machines. So that they can be neutralized and with ICBM's, taken off line? Clues are clues. Draw your own conclusions.
By
Dominick, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
Yes, Dom, one would, sensibly, arrive at your reasoning, but that's human reasoning.
UFOs, as I've often conjectured, might be AI machines looking at nuclear facilities as a conglomeration of fellow AI beings or technical "brothers" and "sisters."
Or those inside the UFOs are fascinated by the machinery, and have no idea what they are intended for.
You (and others) are jumping to human conclusions.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
And so, Ron, there are a multiplicity of possibilities, not just that which comes from human anxiety or the push by those who can only see one avenue for UFO curiosity.
And the supposed surge of UFO scrutiny of water or volcanoes or cows cannot be overlooked as a reasoned observation of things odd to "outsiders."
Clues can be clues or diversions, as Sherlock's creator and Columbo's writers tried to make clear with their fictions.
Atomic substance might be interesting to others....there are a number of reasons UFOs gather at facilities housing missiles or other advanced technology.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
I wonder what's so interesting about us that would attract such attention. Cracking the atom might mean something in the galactic pecking order. Or . . .
I'll repeat this musing: do other worlds have their own UFOs?
By
Ron, at Saturday, April 15, 2023
Post a Comment
<< Home