Lately, I have meditated off and on about where the emphasis is placed when searching for the core truth regarding accounts such as the Hills presented. 99.9% of all investigations, which are not really empirical investigations in the strictest sense, and the focus of the question is: are they true or not true? It may be better to discern them through the eyes of anthropology as living social metaphors and mythologies wherein I suppose they are visionary... where cultural images and imagination create mirror images of their times. In this sensibility, they become narratives of human rather than alien psychology.
RR - A good point. Consider also Robert Heinlein's 'The Puppet Masters' (1951), a flying saucer invasion novel which included a landing in Pascagoula Mississippi:
"The reports long antedated our own achievement of space travel; some of them ran back into the seventeenth century— earlier than that, but it was impossible to judge the quality of reports dating back to a time when "science" meant an appeal to Aristotle. The first systematic data came from the United States itself in the 1940's and '50's. The next flurry was in the 1980's, mostly from Russo-Siberia. These reports were difficult to judge as there was no direct evidence from our own intelligence agents and anything that came from behind the Curtain was usually phony, ipso facto. I noticed something and started taking down dates. Strange objects in the sky appeared to hit a cycle with crests at thirty- year intervals, about. I made a note about it; a statistical analyst might make something of it—or more likely, if I fed it to the Old Man, he would see something in that crystal ball he uses for a brain. "Flying saucers" were tied in with "mysterious disappearances" not only through being in the same category as sea serpents, bloody rain, and such like wild data, but also because in at least three well-documented instances pilots had chased "saucers" and never come back, or down, anywhere, i.e., officially classed as crashed in wild country and not recovered—an "easy out" or "happy hurdle" type of explanation...."
4 Comments:
Lately, I have meditated off and on about where the emphasis is placed when searching for the core truth regarding accounts such as the Hills presented. 99.9% of all investigations, which are not really empirical investigations in the strictest sense, and the focus of the question is: are they true or not true?
It may be better to discern them through the eyes of anthropology as living social metaphors and mythologies wherein I suppose they are visionary... where cultural images and imagination create mirror images of their times.
In this sensibility, they become narratives of human rather than alien psychology.
By
Bruce Duensing, at Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Bruce: "In this sensibility, they become narratives of human rather than alien psychology."
And you have, simplistically, summed up my views on this matter...
By
Tim Hebert, at Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Tim,
I think "simplistically" is the wrong word here.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Wednesday, December 17, 2014
RR -
A good point. Consider also Robert Heinlein's 'The Puppet Masters' (1951), a flying saucer invasion novel which included a landing in Pascagoula Mississippi:
"The reports long antedated our own achievement of space
travel; some of them ran back into the seventeenth century—
earlier than that, but it was impossible to judge the quality of
reports dating back to a time when "science" meant an appeal to
Aristotle. The first systematic data came from the United States
itself in the 1940's and '50's. The next flurry was in the 1980's,
mostly from Russo-Siberia. These reports were difficult to judge
as there was no direct evidence from our own intelligence agents
and anything that came from behind the Curtain was usually
phony, ipso facto.
I noticed something and started taking down dates. Strange
objects in the sky appeared to hit a cycle with crests at thirty-
year intervals, about. I made a note about it; a statistical analyst
might make something of it—or more likely, if I fed it to the Old
Man, he would see something in that crystal ball he uses for a
brain.
"Flying saucers" were tied in with "mysterious disappearances"
not only through being in the same category as sea serpents,
bloody rain, and such like wild data, but also because in at least
three well-documented instances pilots had chased "saucers"
and never come back, or down, anywhere, i.e., officially classed
as crashed in wild country and not recovered—an "easy out" or
"happy hurdle" type of explanation...."
http://www.lightforcenetwork.com/sites/default/files/%5BHeinlein_Robert_A%5D_The_Puppet_Masters%28BookFi.org%29.pdf
By
Kurt Peters, at Thursday, December 18, 2014
Post a Comment
<< Home