UFO Conjectures

Friday, August 25, 2017

Zeitgeist madness vs Ufological madness

Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.

Readers of this blog know (and are tired of) my plaint that ufology’s ET contingent is delusional; that is, the idea that UFOs have been and are a vanguard of extraterrestrial visitors is nutty.
This punk planet, while a paragon of sentience and creativity, is so far removed from any other possible civilized species (communicatively and cosmologically) that the idea UFOs harbor alien visitors, while possible, I admit, remains laughable when one considers the vastness of our galaxy and the universe in its totality.
Why would an alien species forego missions and travels to other planets more spectacular than ours and on par, perhaps with species who are equal in intelligence and advancement as they are to visit here in the numbers indicated by UFO reports?

[An analogy might go something like this: readers circle/visit this blog and other UFO internet venues. If they see something interesting, they’ll leave a comment or pause a moment but they always move on, ending up congregating at what they find as a more interesting, exciting blog or web-site. But, even then, they eventually move on, perhaps, to return again but never fixate on a venue for any long period of time.]

UFO reports show an inordinate, irrational visitation regimen, especially for a species that one would have to assume is highly intelligent or, at least, highly technological and proficient (sensible/sane).

The built up delusion of ET UFO visitation has been exacerbated by various form of media: sci-fi stories, imaginative interpretation of odd ancient records and accounts, movies, and television; even the journalistic print press furthering the ET meme, sometimes jocularly with a wink, but an ET meme nonetheless.

The ufological delusion (madness) is relatively harmless, not psychopathic by a long shot but still a delusion, intellectually and in the common sense.

But there is, and always has been, a deeper madness which I’ve often touched on here, citing the works of Freud (of course), Foucault, Szasz, Scull, et al.

I don’t think I need to cite examples of human madness since the beginning of mankind.

And those of you awake to social media and newscasts in your area know, all too well, that things are mentally amiss in human society, every society – across the Earth – even now.

Madness is delineated in Freud’s Civilization and its Discontents, many of Jung’s works, including Civilization in Transition, Modern Man in Search of a Soul, and Jung on Evil, Foucault’s History of Madness, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of by Reason, Madness: The Invention of an Idea, and Andrew Scull’s Madness in Civilization: A Cultural History of Insanity, from the Bible to Freud, from the Madhouse to Modern Medicine.

Some of the best exegeses of madness, which sprout from mental derangement, of course, but also Evil, are shown in the works of the great, modern American Political Theorist, Hannah Arendt [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Arendt]:
Ms. Arendt is mandatory for those who want to understand the current political mayhem in the world, especially via ISIS and other terrorist groups.

She described madness best, perhaps, in her journalistic forays about Adolf Eichmann, who was requisite in Hitler’s extermination policy and the deportation of Jews to die in concentration camps during the Holocaust.

Her phrase “the banality of evil” summed up what she saw as the common occurrence of evil or madness in mankind.

(She was often vilified for the use of “banal” for such Evil as that displayed during the NAZI regime, but she was and is exactly right: Evil and madness have become banal.)

Just recently, we Americans have seen the kinds of madness that Foucault liked to deal with, the foolishnesses of men, as depicted in Hieronymus Bosch’s Ship of Fools…
 …the frizzy insanity of the August Solar Eclipse and the frazzled purchase of PowerBall tickets.

More dire, the confrontations about Confederate memorial statues and the overt resurgence of racism in American society.

So, with a tepid recounting of madness (and evil) in human society, let me say that the delusional belief by my fellow ufologists and UFO buffs is rather harmless, but still one of the onion skins of madness that permeates humanity and society.

The belief that ET’s aboard UFOs are visiting here is almost whimsical, if it weren’t tied to that deeper mental malaise: madness (insanity).

RR

6 Comments:

  • Hi RR, i've written this comment a number of times only to delete it and begin again. Although I certainly have my moments as a writer, I can't seem to put this comment together in the style I normally would.
    Since i'm having so much trouble connecting my various responses, I will give it in a list of my observations/points.

    I am a skeptic, occasionally surfing among posts and other analysis of incredible claims.
    These include crytids (like bigfoot, lake-monsters, mind-reading radioactive bugs and such), psuedo-medicines, faith-healing, ghosts, psychics, religions, the new-age industry, pyramids, organic farming, reiki and among many others, UFOs.
    I have noticed you have noticed a shift in the common treatment of your blog by readers and, perhaps more importantly, commenters.
    I for one remember hotter times here, before the name change (although i'm unsure what that may have to do with it.)
    Hotter times which had great posts followed by long and exciting comment threads where more regular visitors exchanged ideas, agreed, disagreed and were broken by newer, sometimes first-time commenters.
    Many blogs I have followed have had similar turns. They would run so hot for a time, new developments, reports and claims stirring debate and consideration of ideas.
    But quieter times came along, occasionally leading to the slowing and eventual death of the blog.
    As ufology backs further into the darkened corner of obscurity, it may well be expected that a darkening effect will be suffered by a number of blogs.
    As i've explained to a number of blog-hosts, you must understand the good you are doing here, through times hot and times cold.
    People are gaining from your observations, I have been waiting with bated breathe for someone to describe the doubtful, ethereal nature of belief in E.T visitation as you did in this post, thank you.
    You are doing great things and know that ufology will occasionally create it's own heat, blindingly bright times which raise such debate and unmissable discussion between thinkers.
    A fascination with ufology, which I am not scared to admit that I bear, keeps even the hard-core skeptics like myself turning the ideas over in our heads.
    Skeptics and also many believers are turning against ufology. It's not UFOphobia, it's UFOfatigue. We are tired. It has been so fucking long with so many damn promises and wank-fests about concrete evidence which never comes.

    P.S. Sorry I was rather absent when you informed us of your recent health issues which were truly alarming to us, regular and occasional readers alike. By the time I caught up with what was going on, I had missed it and already read from you a surprise and mild disgust that so few regular names had come forward about it to support you.
    I wish you , RR, health, wealth and wisdom.

    All the best and thanks for being here,
    Woody


    By Blogger Woody, at Monday, August 28, 2017  

  • Thank you Woody...

    You have made my day....maybe even my week.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Monday, August 28, 2017  

  • RR,

    "This punk planet, while a paragon of sentience and creativity, is so far removed from any other possible civilized species (communicatively and cosmologically) that the idea UFOs harbor alien visitors, while possible, I admit, remains laughable when one considers the vastness of our galaxy and the universe in its totality."

    I agree with everything above except for the "punk" planet of course. The notion of visitors interested in our being "a paragon of sentience and creativity" would be the be the answer our being of interest of others.

    The "vastness" issue keeps me coming back to the notion of some form of inter-dimensional travel as the only rational explanation as we have discussed. Linear travel makes no sense. When I read descriptions of craft with portholes I think nonsense or terrestrial testing. When I think about all this too much I get a headache. All these supposed reports and not one clear photograph, another headache. That all reports are bogus also invites pain.

    For all of the above I liked Woody's comment (in your past post) of UFO fatigue but I keep coming back...

    BD



    By Blogger Bryan Daum, at Tuesday, August 29, 2017  

  • Thanks Bryan..

    I'm using "punk" from an "objective" view of the Universe, with its vast array of wonders and planets.

    Our planet isn't punk to me, as it has produced species and civilizations that appear (from my limited trips around the galaxy and beyond) to be unique.

    Could there be another Beethoven somewhere or Michelangelo or a group of writers as skilled and brilliant as those that comprised the Shakespeare consortium?

    Earth is a puny stand-out among the cosmological planets but one of a special kind, even one that might attract alien visitors, just not in the numbers indicated by UFO reports.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Tuesday, August 29, 2017  

  • Hi RR,
    I couldn't resist describing this.
    Here in Australia we have only one major pay-tv group, Foxtel (powerfully conservative 'Fox news' is present but so are an awful lot of other news and general channels, ranging well over the fields of political and social beliefs).

    Just this-afternoon, on the History channel, which many here call the Hitler channel (due to the amount of Nazi Germany and Nazi associated conspiracy pieces that they show), favoured us with an episode of the wank-based show 'The Unknown Files'.
    As usual this particular episode was ufological. I watched the whole thing because within five minutes it had me laughing, shaking my head and already imagining a comment I would send to a site such as this.
    To cut a long story short, here is a list of subjects which were on that show (from merely a mention to a larger part of the whole production);
    The 37th latitude.
    Area 51.
    Dulce.
    Roswell.
    Aztec.
    UFO crashes.
    A 1943 UFO crash claim that I can't even remember the name/location of.
    Reverse technology.
    Government cover-ups, lies and conspiracies.
    Leer.
    Lazar.
    Sighting reports (with no critical evaluation).
    Alien abduction.
    And many, many others, all told with wonder and amazement without mention of what has already been learned about the claims.

    I've noticed this kind of thing many times before and not just by starry-eyed mouth-breathers on the History channel but on the Discovery and Disc Science and other channels as well.

    It seems that decades of investigation, research, reasonable scepticism, gains in the knowledge of natural phenomena and countless rational discussion between thinkers have made next to NO CHANGE in the huge meals of crap that are served to the populace.
    Youngsters, today, are obviously growing up on the same diet of shit that was served to me when I was young. How many of them will grow to seek alternative wise assessment of Ufology or many other forms of excited wank that passes for 'Unexplained' in today's media?

    I got smiles and laughs out of the show, it was a rapid-fire entertainment for a hard-bitten old skeptic like me as I kept hearing the names of subjects in my list above, dragging my opinion of the 'History channel' even lower than it was (if such a thing were possible).

    Had to get all of that off my chest, thank you all for reading.

    Woody

    By Blogger Woody, at Saturday, September 09, 2017  

  • Woody:

    Last night [Friday 9/8] I caught the History Channel's "Ancient Alien" show, which I usually watch.

    While I appreciate the fancy conjectures of guests and hosts, including my pal, Nick Redfern, the suggestions are so far out that I can't imagine anyone taking this stuff seriously.

    The AA guys make some interesting connections and points but then go off the deep end with their conclusions,

    The History Channel is hardly that...history...and it's s shame that such a venue is so academically sloppy and carnivalish.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Saturday, September 09, 2017  

Post a Comment

<< Home