UFO Conjectures

Saturday, June 02, 2018

From my Google UFO news feed

https://sofrep.com/103979/us-navy-spotted-and-tried-to-intercept-ufos-over-the-uss-nimitz-repeatedly-over-a-six-day-span/

3 Comments:

  • And some who participate on this blog, like CDA and ZOAM, will STILL claim that they are not sure that any of this really happened (!), that there has been no public release of the gun camera film (actually there has been), and that we can only know the reality of the situation if and when some independent scientists issue a report. Right. Look, guys, lift your heads from the sand a bit and acknowledge that these carrier sightings are Pentagon and Navy confirmed several times over and that they are evidence of several unknown objects were radar tracked, visually tracked, and repeatedly preformed in an exotic manner. These were UFOs, OK?, and until one lands on the White House lawn, these military reports (and there is a long history of them) will remain the best "evidence" that we have that there are, if fact, unidentified flying objects. But, of course, that was formally acknowledged by the U.S. Military in 1947. Why or why are we still debating that?

    By Blogger Dominick, at Saturday, June 02, 2018  

  • Yes, Dominick, and I don't get the Null Hypothesis, which is being touted at Gilles Fernandez' Facebook UFO page also....an unhelpful, goofy approach to truth or non-truth.

    You and I (and many others) accept the definition and semantic reality of perceptions seen in the sky and designated "UFOs" -- we can call such perceptions anything we want, and discuss them accordingly....this per the views of the brilliant Jacques Derrida.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Saturday, June 02, 2018  

  • I love the bit about discarding anything 'unlikely' hahahahahaha.

    What a completely wide open & subjective term that is.

    Anything 'anomalous' is by definition 'unlikely'.

    Beyond ludicrous.

    By Blogger DrDee, at Thursday, June 07, 2018  

Post a Comment

<< Home