The History Channel’s final airing of its Greatest Mystery Roswell series, Number 3
Copyright 2020, InterAmerica, Inc.
The December 26th History Channel show, Roswell, for the Greatest Mysteries series ended not with a bang but a whimper.
Nothing significant aired during the two-hour show, wrapping up Ben Smith’s alleged investigation of the 1947 Roswell incident, except maybe this ……
The first few minutes of the show had an interview with Linda Corley, who wrote a college paper that became a book; that is, an interview with Jesse Marcel in 1984:
Corley told host/investigator Smith that the symbols were (like) ancient script.
I was surprised to see Calvin Parker, who provided information that Marcel passed on to him when they met (and became friends). The information was what Marcel had come to disclose in his later years: an alien ship crashed near Roswell, strewing alien bodies about, and the military covered up the incident, telling him to keep his mouth shut.
The Ramey memo was not brought up, despite it being lauded as a major breakthrough for the show.
The “Marcel diary” now said to be written by someone else was examined once more by the forensic handwriting expert shown in the first two airings of the “investigation.”
This boiled down to a possibility that Blanchard’s second-in-command was the possible author of the diary, and he was said, by his daughter, to have changed serial numbers of the men who picked up the debris and he also destroyed other evidence, for the good of the country, almost everyone involved – including Marcel – saying that people could not handle what was discovered in the alleged Roswell crash.
Smith and Marcel’s granddaughter went to Marcel’s house where he lived while stationed at Roswell, both looking for debris that Marcel said he hid in the water-heater there. The present owner of the house didn’t let them in, and the moment just petered out.
Like all Roswell investigations, this one was a bust but, again, I’m surprised, like Leslie Kean (who was interviewed), that those recalling their apparent discussions with Marcel are so normal and credible.
The people involved, the relatives and friends of Marcel, do seem to be providing accurate accounts of what Marcel told them.
That he may have dissembled – as many UFOers are currently claiming – is another matter altogether.
For me, Roswell is boring, hackneyed in its long-time making the ufological rounds.
And this History Channel outing didn’t help: a three-part program that was more of a dirge than an exhilaration of new insights.
RR


3 Comments:
That's ufology entertainment -and sadly, while there were sincere sounding reports, no significant new information was presented. Not a Roswell fan, I'll admit to having once again held out a hope that a punch line revelation was forthcoming -but alas, back to reality and disappointed again...
BD
By
Bryan Daum, at Monday, December 28, 2020
Rich -
Contrary to what they claimed, Patrick Saunders was not the second in command. He wasn't even third. There were 17 lieutenant colonels on the base in 1947, each of whom outranked Saunders. I don't know where they got the idea that Saunders was so important in the Roswell chain of command, but he was way down there... and, as you probably know now, those on the program missed the importance of what Saunders wrote on the flyleaf of the book The Truth about the UFO Crash at Roswell. It is one of the few statements written by one of those involved who did not seek publicity and who probably thought that his revelation would not be seen by me.
By
KRandle, at Tuesday, December 29, 2020
Not surprised Kevin....
That History mucked up Saunders' ranking.
But you looked good, and sensible, thankfully.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Tuesday, December 29, 2020
Post a Comment
<< Home