Google UFO Alerts for 4/20 contained links about the Congressional UAP hearing yesterday 4/19, most hyping AARO’s dismissal of an ET explanation for UFOs
Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.
I’m not a fan of the extraterrestrial explanation for the
UFO phenomenon as you know, but I’m now a little iffy dismissing the possibility. Why?
Dr. Kirkpatrick's hearings comments to Congress 4/19 downplaying an ET source for UAP was a bit much; and his promotion of a possible Russian or Chinese drone explanation was even more of a bit much, too silly considering the long, documented history of the phenomenon.
Most of us long-timers and real enthusiasts believe that the U.S. military has and has kept secret what it has discovered about UFOs, very likely having UFO debris from a UFO crash or downing.
So, pushing UAP [UFOs!] into a modern technical category seems more like a ploy to distract or dismay UFO believers into a more sober view, one not even close to the reality.
UFO newbies may fall for the “brainwash” but the rest of us, long-in-the-tooth UFO fanatics are not gulled.
Dr. Kirkpatrick's hearings comments to Congress 4/19 downplaying an ET source for UAP was a bit much; and his promotion of a possible Russian or Chinese drone explanation was even more of a bit much, too silly considering the long, documented history of the phenomenon.
Most of us long-timers and real enthusiasts believe that the U.S. military has and has kept secret what it has discovered about UFOs, very likely having UFO debris from a UFO crash or downing.
So, pushing UAP [UFOs!] into a modern technical category seems more like a ploy to distract or dismay UFO believers into a more sober view, one not even close to the reality.
UFO newbies may fall for the “brainwash” but the rest of us, long-in-the-tooth UFO fanatics are not gulled.
Image atop from Patriot Mobile
RR
RR
posted by RRRGroup at
Thursday, April 20, 2023
5 Comments:
My reaction exactly. And I almost fell over when he said that IF AARO determined that some UAP were extra-terestial, he would inform NASA (!). (How about telling me, sucker; after all I've waited 70 years and I'm paying for everything).Also notice that he said that AARO's own analysis of UAP are often farmed out to unspecified (retired) individuals beyond AARO for comment and review. I'll just bet.
By
Dominick, at Thursday, April 20, 2023
If there are retired individuals out there looking over UAP stuff, let's find out their names so we can determine whether they are qualified to be in the know...
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Thursday, April 20, 2023
They'll give it to Sheaffer since Klass is unavailable.
By
Ron, at Thursday, April 20, 2023
UFO = Chinese lantern
UAP = Chinese drone
I detect a theme.
By
Ron, at Thursday, April 20, 2023
Hahaha, Ronald....
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Thursday, April 20, 2023
Post a Comment
<< Home