UFO Conjectures

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Bill Chalker and the Peter Khoury farce

Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.

The Anomalist ballyhooed, in its July 26 listings, Bill Chalker’s “notable” evaluation of the Peter Khoury supposed “abduction” scenario(s).

Anomalist writes that Mr. Chalker’s research into the alleged abduction was and is scientific, as it involves analysis of hair, purported to have come from one of the women who were part of the “abduction” event.

I find the whole Khoury story to be a psychological farce and here’s why:

I’m inputting, here, what is a part of the Chalker/Khoury tale as presented at The Oz Files that Anomalist cited. I hope that The Oz Files sees my use of their material as “fair use” since I need the extract (excerpt) to make my point:


“At that time Peter Khoury had no real context to anchor his disturbing experience. Eventually he became aware of the alien abduction controversy and tried to understand what was happening.  Strange experiences continued, the most striking, and ultimately the most revealing, occurred on July 23, 1992.

At about 7 am, having returned to his Sydney suburban home from a train station, after dropping off his wife, Khoury felt unwell and lay down on the bed to sleep. He awoke with a start sometime later, becoming aware of something alighting on the bed. He was shocked to see two strange women kneeling on the end of his bed. Both were naked. One appeared Nordic and the other Asian.

Aspects of their appearance were quite odd. The Nordic female had a very elongated face and a sharply point chin. Her eyes appeared to be blue and 2 to 3 times larger than normal. She had very fine wispy blonde hair that seemed to be oddly blown up. Her skin colour was quite light. The dark brown skinned Asian looking woman seemed to have almost completely black eyes. Her hair was black and set in a firm page-boy style.
Although no normal communication occurred, the Nordic woman seemed to be in charge and Khoury got the impression she was giving the Asian looking woman some sort of instruction.

What followed was quite disorientating for Khoury. The Nordic woman, who seemed to be over 6 feet tall and apparently very strong, reached forward and pulled Khoury's head to her breast. He resisted, trying to pull away.  She did this 3 times. Finally Khoury, trying to cope with the shock and disorientating nature of this experience, bit on her nipple apparently swallowing a piece from it.  Although seemingly confused, she did not react with any pain and nor was there any sign of blood. She seemed to convey to the other woman, seemingly through a form of telepathy, that this was not the way things were supposed to happen. Khoury was overcome with a coughing fit. Moments later, looking up again, he found that both women had vanished.

The coughing caused Khoury to go to the bathroom to get a drink of water. When he went to urinate he found it very painful to do so, due to, it turned out, some very fine blonde hair wrapped tightly under his foreskin. Khoury removed the hair and had the foresight to place it in a plastic sachet bag with a seal. He did that because he felt there was no way it should have been there. It was unlike his wife's hair.

Khoury concluded that something extraordinarily bizarre had just occurred and linked the blonde thin hair to the strange tall, blonde haired Nordic looking woman.

I undertook a very detailed investigation.  Born in 1964, in Lebanon, Peter Khoury migrated to Australia in 1973. He met his future wife, Vivian in 1981, marrying in 1990. They have 2 children. What might be Peter's first encounter with a UFO occurred in Lebanon in the summer of 1971 at age 7. He and seven other children had gone up onto the flat rooftop of his neighbour's house to play. Peter was the last to walked through a heavy door that leads onto the roof. He then saw all his friends "frozen" like statues in front of him, while a silent egg-shaped craft hovered above. All eight children later found themselves on the ground floor after some time had elapsed, with no memory of the intervening period.”

Anyone with a smidgen of  psychology knowledge can see that Peter Khoury’s episodic interchanges with “abductors” or extra-territorial beings (ETs and their UFOs) is a conglomeration of psychological and/or neurological malfeasances of Mr. Khoury’s fevered brain.

I suggest that those inclined to set aside my opinion get a copy of Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s Psychopathia Sexualis [my copy: English translation, Bell Publishing Co., NY, 1965] and read cases 57, 68, and 103 to be specific and then read the total overlay of psychopathic behavior rooted in sexual maladies.

There are concomitant case studies in Freud and Jung of course, but the story, as related partially here and totally in Mr. Chalker’s book, is patently clear that at the core of Mr. Khoury’s experience is a sexual pathology, and the “hair” proffered as a distinct clue to Mr. Khoury’s “adventure” is merely a red-herring, derived from where, who knows?
This kind of fanciful tale mongering is shameful for its lack of psychological considerations that scream out at knowledgeable readers.

I’m surprised that WM at The Anomalist gave a citation to such palpable foolishness.

RR

5 Comments:

  • In the story per your post, we again have a common "abduction" theme based on a sexual fantasy. The psychiatric pathology is all too apparent.

    What happen to the hair sampling evidence? Was it ever properly evaluated?

    By Blogger Tim Hebert, at Sunday, July 30, 2017  

  • Tim:

    The "hair" sample has been analyzed, but I haven't looked at the final evaluation (my bad).

    It was so obvious to me, from previous excursion into this case, that it was a psychological (or neurological) episode, preceded by earlier pathological events, that I eschewed the "hair" evidence.

    I'm hoping that Bill Chalker, who has visited here before, might enlighten us.

    Without that, I'll dig around to get more info on the "hair" sample, despite it being a "mcguffin.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Sunday, July 30, 2017  

  • So chalker is telling us, without flinching, that these alien chicks travelled all the way here to get their nipples chewed off. I would have imagined they could have invented a nipple chewing machine by now... this is as scientific as it gets... ufology really starting to be pitiful, for shame. Btw, he's got to check is frenulums periodically !

    By Blogger Unknown, at Sunday, July 30, 2017  

  • Before responding to your post could you please clarify which cases in your 1965 Bell edition of Psychopathia Sexualis equate to. I have access to 2 different editions - the 7th & 12th editions.
    7th edition: Case 57: "A gentleman in Paris", 12th edition: Case 57: "I am 3-5 years old"
    7th edition: Case 68: "S. New York, is accused of being a street thief", 12th edition: Z. aged 27, artist"
    7th edition: Case 103: "A middle-aged woman in the asylum", 12th edition: X. Son of a general"
    If yours is different to both of these, please provide a scan of the cases, in order for me to respond appropriately.

    By Blogger Bill Chalker, at Wednesday, August 02, 2017  

  • I can't scan the pages Bill as that would require me to ruin the book spine.

    My case 57 is, indeed,a 35 year old who fantasizes about women (mistresses) who are rough, one whom he wished to have him harnessed to a carriage, naked and punished, whipped by her....etc. etc.

    Case 68 is an artist, not a street thief, who had to be repulsed and annoyed...and toward whom he had a particular fetish for some part of her body, etc., etc.

    Case 103 is, indeed, son of a general who could not be excited by a brunette but, needed a blonde to excite him.

    My point, which I suppose you would wish to debunk, is that Krafft-Ebing's case studies, many more than I alluded to, are rife with elements that mimic Khoury's.

    But such cases are not limited to Krafft-Ebing, as I noted.

    I could provide a plethora of cases, from Freud, Jung, and others that show Khoury's delusions to be sexual in nature, not extraterrestrial.

    I know you've hung your ufological hat on this case but it is only a medical issue not an alien abduction case, by a long shot.

    Not to see that is what make ufology so dismissed.

    You have a claim that can be explained by psychology or psychiatry and today neurology but you wish to cling to the ET abduction nonsense.

    I think highly of you but in this instance, not to see that Khoury has deep rooted sexual issues is to miss the obvious, for some of us.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Wednesday, August 02, 2017  

Post a Comment

<< Home