UFO Conjectures

Friday, January 05, 2018

UFOs have always adjusted to humanity’s mind-set(s)

Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.
UFO behavior has ever been peculiar, as described by witnesses, but it always has been re-active; that is, UFOs and, sometimes, entities seemingly from them have responded to witness mental acuity and emotionality, and that human mentality/emotional makeup has been different through various stages (ages) of mankind.

UFO behavior is predictive, or could have been, if researchers noted that the phenomenon’s presence and activity (behavior) was recognized as determinant, based on the psychology or instinctive reaction of those seeing or being accosted by a UFO visitation.

For example, in the earliest eras of man’s existence, the Neolithic period when mankind became “conscious” as suggested in the hypotheses of Julian Jaynes, the mental acuity of these early humans have been denoted as primitive, and the appearance of a UFO or any attendant entities would have been received as one more new experience that Neolithic man was becoming aware of.
As consciousness expanded and became more sophisticated, early man ascribed early UFO appearances as divine or from an ethereal existence and lo, we have the beginning of religion.

For a period of time – from primitive man to the evolved state of tribes and cultured or “refined” humans – UFOs had the patina of divinity: UFOs took on the hallmarks of saints or religious icons.

This remained so well into the 17th and 18th centuries.

With the advent of balloon flight, UFOs behaved like airships, making appearances that mimicked balloon flights of the period.
As air travel progressed into the modern era, UFOs took on (morphed into) the likes of human aircraft, with occasional landings whereupon humanoid beings sometimes emerged to interact with humans. The French wave of the 1950s is an example.

People during this period, even pilots like George Gorman who had a “dogfight” with a UFO in 1948, held back from truly aggressive behavior.

There was a reticence to act barbarically, even in the face of a phenomenon that caused anxiety because of its strangeness.

The small entities rife in Europe during the 1950s wave of "deplaning" humanoids interacting with farmers (mostly) and other docile humans were not met with any aggressive behavior by those who were confronted by such weird beings.
Men and women were almost courteous, even when facing something that was outside their normative existence.

Right up through the Hills purported abduction or Travis Walton’s “kidnapping” in the mid-1970s, humans did not react to UFO intrusions in ways that were outside the model of cautious reticence or polite behavior.

And UFOs and their contained entities behaved belligerently, even hostilely as in the Michalak (1967 Falcon Lake aggression) and the 1979 Taylor attack (in Scotland).

But then in the 1980s, human behavior took a turn for the worse; people starting acting boorishly, and more aggressive than in the past.

With the advent of the internet, human behavior has devolved into the worst kind of behavior, people of all stripes hoping to become viral by doing the most outrageous things.
And thus, UFOs taking note of this change in human behavior have become reticent to interact or engage with humans, whether in the air or on the ground.

UFO reports of little or tall entities showing up to mingle with humans have all but disappeared.

And UFOs courting response from aircraft has ceased also.

 What does this imply? That UFOs have a connection with the psyche of humankind?

That human behavior has some control over what UFOs are, and the phenomenon is geared to the zeitgeist or psychological Weltanschauung of a human time period?

RR

7 Comments:

  • So UFOs react to a more positive manner based on a stable social construct?

    Perhaps our neural synapses are increasingly more stimulated (dopamine/serotonin) via today's instant social gratification leaving the UFO meme in the dust bin of human consciousness...for now.

    God help us for what truly lies in the near future for instant human gratification...Big Foot and Nessie will be the next to consciously fall by the wayside.

    I recall the complaint that one person made to a well known medium some years ago that he could never get in contact with or see ghost and spirits. "That's because you don't believe in them." replied the medium.

    By Blogger Tim Hebert, at Friday, January 05, 2018  

  • "But then in the 1980s, human behavior took a turn for the worse; people starting acting boorishly, and more aggressive than in the past."

    As opposed to, for instance, the first half of the 20th century when world wars slaughtered tens of millions? If UFO's are watching our cultural development that closely they will undoubtedly recognize that the world is, in general, far more compassionate and tolerant now than at any time in huiman history. But why would we conclude that they have the slightest interest in such changes? There is no body of evidentiary work to support that thesis.

    Speculating on why aliens are interested in us is always fun though.

    What did the alien say to the gas pump?
    Take your finger out of your nose while I speak to you.

    By Blogger solarity, at Friday, January 05, 2018  

  • Solarity:

    Hahaha.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Friday, January 05, 2018  

  • "debarking"? Perhaps you meant to say "disembarking"?

    The Grandma Police.

    By Blogger David From AU, at Sunday, January 07, 2018  

  • David...

    I meant "debarking" -- those ETs are dogged in their activity.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Sunday, January 07, 2018  

  • "That human behavior has some control over what UFOs are". It has always intrigued me that sightings in the 50's and 60's generally involved classic 'flying saucers', as if that was all we could mentally come up with regarding a potential shape. And since movies and TV then fed into that mindset, it continued as such for the next 20 years. There were seemingly no sightings of a Starship Enterprise craft or anything like the ship in the recent 'Arrival' movie. That we even considered as feasible (and not laughable) as potential interstellar craft the McMinville or Heflin photos (perhaps hoaxes should not be brought into this discussion) indicates to me that UFO's (the non-hoaxed variety) are no different than fashion, cars, etc - they change with the times. And that's troubling since it means either witnesses are influencing what they see, or are being visually fed what is deemed appropriate for us in that time period.

    The recent CGI faked UFO's on YouTube are very impressively rendered and represent what we now in the early 21'st century perceive as potential interstellar craft. There certainly weren't any of those during the heyday of UFO sightings from the 50's - 70's.

    Going back once again to Socorro: a small egg-shaped craft with actual retractable 'landing gear', like something out of a Twilight Zone episode or B-movie of the time??? . Why did Zamora 'see' this and not a super-snazzy Millenium Falcon? Because he could certainly 'understand' and draw an egg, and it served the purpose of whatever is responsible for these sightings. I'd be much more in the ET camp if he, while being interviewed, said: "it was like nothing I've ever seen before, nothing I could even conceive of - I'm not even sure I can draw what I saw". But instead he saw an egg.

    By Blogger jamesrav, at Wednesday, January 10, 2018  

  • James...

    I couldn't agree more.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Wednesday, January 10, 2018  

Post a Comment

<< Home