The alien Fish men who visited Earth?
Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.
The Times Literary Supplement’s 6000 anniversary issue,
March 30, 2018, had a review of a new book by William Poole [Milton and the Making of Paradise
Lost, Harvard University Press, 2018].
The reviewer Neil Forsyth notes that Milton, as
scholar-poet, used Georgius Syncellus book Chronographia, [circa 809
A.D.] and, before that, John Selden’s De diis Syris for references to
the Babylonian creative myths.
Looking up, Syncellus’ work, from Google, which was provided
in a Latin version, I sought material about the Babylonian myth referred to.
It turns out that the myth involved “fish men” who were seen
as Gods by the Babylonians, a belief that was also a tenet of Mesopotamia and
is referred to in the 1966 book Intelligent Life In the Universe by I.
S. Shklovskii and Carl Sagan [PB, Page 457 ff.]
(Shklovskii and Sagan intimated, in their book, that
Earth was visited by extraterrestrials about 10,000 years ago, in the vicinity
of the Middle East.)
Many of you know the story of Oannes (Adapa), the creature
(God?) that came from the sea to help the early inhabitants of Babylon and
Mesopotamia. (See http://oannes.com/)
You know that I eschew the AA “theory” of ETs visiting the
Earth to help (or use) humans in ancient times.
But the idea that divine fish entities appeared on Earth
intrigues, as it is so seemingly bizarre, as was the view of early
Mediterranean scholars who read/studied the texts of their precursors.
The Fish-men-gods disappeared from religious texts after the
cuneiform references noted and have never appeared as disembarked UFO entities
in the flying saucer literature, although the Rosales humanoid books contain
dozens of mermaid/merman accounts, none associated with UFOs, and all appearing
to be misinterpretations of persons or sea creatures.
While the Greeks had Poseidon, their God from the sea, that
God was human-like in configuration, not a being with a fish body or fish
appurtenances.
My point, if there is one, is that, for some odd reason, the
fish-gods seem to have been unique to rather sophisticated early cultures, but
why?
That creatures came from the sea, rather than the sky is
open to mythological speculation.
And does that early Babylonian/Mesopotamian theological
belief have any standing worthy of further scrutiny.
Yes, if one is interested in the mind-set(s) of ancient
civilizations, civilizations being the operative word. These aren’t Neolithic
cultures, but somewhat refined societies that would seem unlikely to
imagine gods coming from the sea.
RR


4 Comments:
The depths of the sea, the depths of the (Hollow) Earth, the depths of space all are, in one regard (n.b. _one_ _regard_) tropes for the Unconscious, or so, surely, Jung would note, could we get a hold of him on the Ouija Board or know what frequency to scan for the Electronic voice Phenomenon broadcast!
By
Bryan Sentes, at Friday, May 04, 2018
Cthulhu Lives!!
By
Nick Redfern, at Friday, May 04, 2018
Keep smiling:)…
To day, if we see "divers" walk out of the water, we would think little of it, because we understand about such things, but in "ancient times" the word "Diver" would not be in their vocabulary as we understand a diver to be, in the 20th.century. Soooo, in ancient times on seeing "Divers" come out of the water would naturally be seen as, "fish men" or Water gods of the sea. Something to think about:)..........?
By
Daniel, at Friday, May 04, 2018
"Adapa as a fisherman was iconographically portrayed as a fish-man composite."
For all of the knowledge and technology that fishing the ocean for a certain and unending source of food involves and commerce: ship building, ropes, sails, nets; navigation, astronomy, currents, tides, winds and weather. It's no wonder that the fish-man was the most important of gods representing civilization itself, science and wisdom.
By
zoamchomsky, at Saturday, May 05, 2018
Post a Comment
<< Home