A search for substantive information (not statistical data) inside UFO reports (tales and accounts)
Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.
Some of you know that InterAmerica provides psychological
evaluations to news media about its staff and the public it serves.
Psychometric information is grist for evaluations of both the pro- viders and the recipients of information generated for them.
Our computer programming is geared for psychometric evaluations, but two of our fellows have implemented programming to separate out, information that forms analytic data apart from a psychological overlay.
Psychometric information is grist for evaluations of both the pro- viders and the recipients of information generated for them.
Our computer programming is geared for psychometric evaluations, but two of our fellows have implemented programming to separate out, information that forms analytic data apart from a psychological overlay.
Several of our computers have been so configured so that we
can enter UFO reportage to determine if there are repetitive details of a
unique kind among the few hundred cases we’ve selected from the vast collection
of UFO accounts collected by Albert Rosales, Preston Dennett and, of course, José Caravaca, Caravaca’s information also containing episodes outside UFO lore
but pertinent to encounters with “the other” of religious and paranormal
literature.
What we’re looking for is not psychological evaluations of UFO witnesses or data.
We’re looking for analytical information that shows up in varying accounts, not connected by anything but its subject matter.
Data is a subset which factors into any evaluation of what was witnessed or experienced but is not the primary motivation for our search.
We’re looking for like or similar details that pertain to those encounters with entities or beings said or thought to be coming from somewhere other than this planets observable reality – not necessarily other planets in interstellar space.
For example, here is a fictional account of a UFO encounter and how our computer’s artificial intelligence programs would dissect it:
What we’re looking for is not psychological evaluations of UFO witnesses or data.
We’re looking for analytical information that shows up in varying accounts, not connected by anything but its subject matter.
Data is a subset which factors into any evaluation of what was witnessed or experienced but is not the primary motivation for our search.
We’re looking for like or similar details that pertain to those encounters with entities or beings said or thought to be coming from somewhere other than this planets observable reality – not necessarily other planets in interstellar space.
For example, here is a fictional account of a UFO encounter and how our computer’s artificial intelligence programs would dissect it:
----------------
"We had several friends over for a cook out last Sunday, 1/22. [USELESS INFORMATION]
As we stood around, drinking beer and wine [PSYCHOMETRIC INFO], waiting for the steaks to grill. An orange-glowing disk [ANALYTICS] flew over and landed adjacent to our garden. [USELESS INFO]
"We had several friends over for a cook out last Sunday, 1/22. [USELESS INFORMATION]
As we stood around, drinking beer and wine [PSYCHOMETRIC INFO], waiting for the steaks to grill. An orange-glowing disk [ANALYTICS] flew over and landed adjacent to our garden. [USELESS INFO]
From a hatch that opened [ANALYTICS], a short being emerged
[ANALYTICS], wearing a green uniform.[ANALYTICS]
The being approached us, as we stood frozen in a kind of fear or awe. [PSYCHOMETRIC INFO]
It seemed to mumble something [ANALYTICS] none of us understood [PSYCHOMETRIC INFO], sort of waved [ANALYTICS] and went back to its craft, entered the hatch [ANALYTICS], and when it closed, the disk rose to about 200 feet [DATA] and then shot from sight disappearing in about 5 seconds. [DATA]
The being approached us, as we stood frozen in a kind of fear or awe. [PSYCHOMETRIC INFO]
It seemed to mumble something [ANALYTICS] none of us understood [PSYCHOMETRIC INFO], sort of waved [ANALYTICS] and went back to its craft, entered the hatch [ANALYTICS], and when it closed, the disk rose to about 200 feet [DATA] and then shot from sight disappearing in about 5 seconds. [DATA]
We stood stunned and silent."[PSYCHOMETRICS]
-----------
The programming used would separate the analytics from the psychologically oriented material and set data apart in its own categorical listing.
What we hope to find are those similarities that resonate as unique and show up consistently in some credible UFO tales or incidents.
From that we might contemplate what is being authentically experienced by those witnesses not afflicted by hysterical or pathological mental straits.
RR
The programming used would separate the analytics from the psychologically oriented material and set data apart in its own categorical listing.
What we hope to find are those similarities that resonate as unique and show up consistently in some credible UFO tales or incidents.
From that we might contemplate what is being authentically experienced by those witnesses not afflicted by hysterical or pathological mental straits.
RR
posted by RRRGroup at
Saturday, January 28, 2023
6 Comments:
Wow. I'm impressed and strongly support this research agenda. (I would think that the military/intelligence authorities, if they take some UFO reports as "serious business", would have done something similar to this already.) Btw, I have a special interest in any "health related issues" experienced in reasonably close encounters and would hope that that issue could be identified, broken out, tabulated and analyzed.
By
Dominick, at Saturday, January 28, 2023
Now you're cooking.
By
Ron, at Saturday, January 28, 2023
I like the idea of pulling out any health material as I think some impact reports.
But it would be a side issue, like my interest in the psychological aspects.
I'll broach the matter with the fellows, who have been dogged lately with some issues requested by clients.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, January 28, 2023
Maybe half-baked Ron.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, January 28, 2023
Similar to my past attempts to decipher MUFON reports using subjective vs. objective criteria. Same as we use for patient assessments on our hospital unit.
I applied this approach to a specific MUFON case back in 2015:
https://timhebert.blogspot.com/2015/01/an-analysis-of-recent-mufon-case.html
This particular report had some degree of meat on the bone as compared to the usual MUFON fare. As you can see, more questions arised from the report...
By
Tim Hebert, at Saturday, January 28, 2023
I suggest readers here use Tim's URL to read his interesting assessment of his sample.
However, such an analysis can't be done in that way for several hundred cases or accounts.
It's too wieldly, separating "we drove to gran'ma's house" or "we parked our car" from essential information and other non-relevant information.
The algorithm(s) needed to weed out non-important information or even data, per se, and the psychological elements I'd like to see or the health info that Dominick would find interesting is asking too much, and complicates the bare, unique information that will make inroads to a reality of an actual "alien" encounter.
Craft data, the minds of the witnesses, or their health, or weather data all circumvent what we're looking for. and my computer guys were a little huffy when I suggested an increase in varying information.
I get their point.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, January 28, 2023
Post a Comment
<< Home