Ignorant comment(s)!
Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.
A semi-regular here offered a few comments, for my
UFOs/Reality post the other day.
This persons took offense at my writing that Constantine saw
a UFO at the Milvian Bridge [312 A.D.] during the civil war battle with
Maxentius.
Constantine had a dream before the battle wherein he
allegedly saw the heavenly sign of God, interpreted as the chi-ro Christogram
by some but interpreted as a staurogram, a variant of the chi-ro Christogram by
Lactantius in his On the Death of the Persecutors (ca. 315). [Page 135, Constantine
by Paul Stephenson, The Overlook Press, 2009]
On the day [sic] of the battle, Constantine saw, in the sky,
the cross of Christ, as reported by Church Father Eusebius, which is my source
for suggesting that Constantine saw a UFO in the sky.
Stephenson, in his book (cited above) writes “Constantine’s
vision has a vast literature. For skepticism on the need to find a rational
explanation … see Averil Cameron Constantine and Christianity … and O.
Nicholson, ‘Constantine’s vision of the Cross’ [in] Vigilae
Christianae 54 (2000: 309-23).” [op.cit. Page 332]
The skeptical views are remarkably similar to those for the
Airship wave(s) of 1896-1897.
Stephenson cites P. Weis writing that the ‘vision’ was of a
solar halo in 310 [?] and other papers stating “the vision took place in
September 312 when the planets Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars were aligned in the
constellations of Capricorn and Sagittarius. Later in October 312, Venus was
also virtually [sic] in line with Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars. A fixed line of
visible stars crossed the axis, creating a cross and one could discern at the
end of this line Vega, the brightest star in the configuration … It was this
configuration of planets and stars, it is argued, that Constantine saw and
turned in his favor as he approached Rome … Although such a configuration would
have been visible to all at night, it would not have been clear during the day.
Eusebius maintained that the vision took place during the afternoon, while the
sun was high in the sky, which would have obscured, not illuminated, an
alignment of planets.” [op.cit. Pages 338-339]
As you can see, skeptics of the “vision” go to extremes to
debunk, and the person commenting on my assertion of a UFO observation also
went on, after employing an explanation like that of the skeptics above,
writing that Constantine’s “vision” was a contrivance, a ruse, to cement his
(Constantine’s) conversion to Christianity in the minds of Roman citizens.
The possibility that Constantine created his dream and
vision, while in the midst of battle, or immediately thereafter is a
possibility, I admit, but one that is so outlandish when one reads the extant
accounts of the battle and Constantine’s mind-set, any sensible person would
eschew the suggestion.
But this isn’t the only ignorant element of this person’s
commentary. He went on to scold me for suggesting that John Keel was done in,
eventually, by his obsession with UFOs.
This John Keel fascination has become a staple of ufological
madness lately. Persons, who should know better, ignore the descent into
dementia that John Keel was experiencing in the latter part of his life: the
supposed connection(s) to extraterrestrials or alien spirits whom he thought he
was in communication with.
Now I think Keel wrote a few books and articles that are
precious for UFO believers: Operation Trojan Horse and The Mothman
Prophecies, to name a few.
But such “erudite” renderings do not establish an
end-of-life sanity. Everyone knows, nowadays, that dementia, Alzheimer’s, and
total madness are rife among the aging population, and even among younger
members of humanity.
That some UFO enthusiasts continue to laud John Keel, in the
absence of anyone else with his former cachet, is a kind of madness itself, or
an ignorance that disallowed me from inputting the person’s commentary.
Finally, as for Constantine’s “vision,” I accept it as an
historical given, following the rules of Derrida about fictive truths.
And here is a modern artist’s rendition of that “vision.”
From:
Constantine raised his eyes to the heavens, and fell in awe
at the sight of that great expanse. Then he heard the voice of God, "By
this symbol you will conquer".
RR



10 Comments:
Good afternoon,
A sundog is a very likely explanation:
https://www.metabunk.org/sk/20151025-161821-t02b2.jpg
It takes little imagination to see a cross in it.
Regards,
Jean
By
Rare phenomena lover, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
I don't think that's the case here Jean.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
More details about the battle of the Milvian Bridge:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Milvian_Bridge
Here also the sundog hypothesis is proposed.
But, it is clear that we will never be 100% sure that this is the right explanation.
There is simply not enough information in the historical accounts. But we know that optical and astronomical phenomena were
often interpreted in a symbolic fashion. For examples, comets were often represented a a sword in the sky.
Regards,
Jean
By
Rare phenomena lover, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
If we take a step back, all we can say about Constantine's vision is that a number of historical sources report that Constantine said he had it.
Did he really have the vision? There's no way to prove it one way or the other. So, arguing over whether or not it was real is a pointless pursuit.
By
purrlgurrl, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
Okay...
Here's my point: Church history says Constantine had a vision, of something in the sky.
Did he or didn't he doesn't matter. The Derridaian "fictive truth" establishes the "legend."
It's now a matter of record, as it were.
If Constantine used a misinterpretation of a meteorological event or even just contrived, concocted, the story to establish Christianity and the Catholic faith in the Roman world, the contrivance or misinterpretation brought about one of the most significant changes in society (humanity) of all times.
That, for me, is the effect of Constantine seeing something or pretending to see something.
I like to think that Constantine, one of the great Roman emperors, not mad like Nero or Caligula, actually saw a sign -- had a vision, as Eusebius wrote (and believed).
I'll elaborate on belief in an upcoming post, to clarify my position.
To take a we don't know or will never know position along with the idea that a man of intelligence and brilliance was gulled by a sundog offends my sensibilities.
A thorough study of the battle scene and "supposed" event, along with a serious review of Constantine's mind-set and conversion activity should be concluded before one attempts to speak to the issue, something that the person who provoked me to input the posting being discussed here didn't do, and I'm not seeing much in the way of erudition in the comments I'm replying to in the moment.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
"If Constantine used a misinterpretation of a meteorological event or even just contrived, concocted, the story to establish Christianity and the Catholic faith in the Roman world, the contrivance or misinterpretation brought about one of the most significant changes in society (humanity) of all times."
Why not? The role of chance or random events to alter the course of human history is underestimated. Also, does that means
that this vision was crucial in winning the Milvian Bridge battle? Winning a battle is a question of good military strategy, courage and, yes, chance also. Perhaps Constantine would have won the battle even without the "vision".
"To take a we don't know or will never know position along with the idea that a man of intelligence and brilliance was gulled by a sundog offends my sensibilities."
Sundogs were already explained as a natural phenomenon at the time. But they were considered divine signs by some.
In the following article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_dog
there is a mention of a battle where sundogs played a role:
"Wars of the Roses
The prelude to the Battle of Mortimer's Cross in Herefordshire, England in 1461 is supposed to have involved the appearance of a halo display with three "suns". The Yorkist commander, later Edward IV of England, convinced his initially frightened troops that it represented the three sons of the Duke of York, and Edward's troops won a decisive victory. The event was dramatized by William Shakespeare in King Henry VI, Part 3,[21] and by Sharon Kay Penman in The Sunne In Splendour."
So, another case where a natural phenomenon was seen as a surnatural sign.
The Nuremberg Chronicle contains drawings of sundogs. The representation of the top one is strikingly similar to the description of Constantine's vision including the cross over the Sun:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_dog#/media/File:Nuremberg_chronicles_-_Sun_Dogs_(CCIIIv).jpg
"A thorough study of the battle scene and "supposed" event, along with a serious review of Constantine's mind-set and conversion activity should be concluded before one attempts to speak to the issue, something that the person who provoked me to input the posting being discussed here didn't do, and I'm not seeing much in the way of erudition in the comments I'm replying to in the moment."
The only way to progress would be to see if the phenomenon was observed by other persons than Constantine, soldiers for example.
Regards,
Jean
By
Rare phenomena lover, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
I respectfully submit that we can never know Constantine's mind-set before, during, or after the battle. We can only speculate some 1700 years later looking back through the lens of a culture vastly different from Constantine's. To suggest that we might understand his mind set through a "serious review" is a little bit disingenuous. Besides, we have no firsthand account from Constantine, just after-the-fact reports from Christian historians.
As someone raised Catholic, I'm familiar with Church propaganda. And the story of Constantine's vision has a little whiff of that about it.
By
purrlgurrl, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
PG:
I have to disagree....we have a bundle of materials, extant, that indicate how and why Constantine was thinking at the time.
A list of his proclamations and missives, along with his actions, tell us where his mind was.
The Church didn't need propaganda. Constantine made the Church the official religion of Rome.
That the Church would laud and exploit the legend is, of course, a possibility, even a probability, but that doesn't take it -- the alleged vision -- out of the realm of actuality.
The dream, tethered to the vision account, is important, in the psychological sense, and the additions of the dream image to military equipment -- provided in a plethora of historical finds by author Stephenson -- cements the "reality" of the dream, for some of us.
Like the meeting with Jesus, after his death, by disciples on the Road to Emmaus, all of this could be imagined and hallucinatory or even contrived by Christian proselytizers but, even then, one has to see it as a fictional reality which, according to Derrida, is more truthful than truth.
(I've covered Derrida's thinking, as best as I'm able to, often here, with more to come.)
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
Jean:
I grant you that Constantine may have seen a sundog and used it to proclaim he saw the sign of Jesus, the sign of the cross.
But that would mean Constantine was as common and stupid as his soldiers and without a mentality that knew the difference between a weather phenomenon and a chi-ro.
I'm hesitant to go along with that.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Wednesday, July 04, 2018
well, RR, as long as you are keeping an open mind.
By
ralphie boy, at Friday, July 13, 2018
Post a Comment
<< Home