The Meaninglessness of UFOs today
Copyright 2019, InterAmerica, Inc.
Do UFOs matter? Did they ever?
In the early days of flying saucers [1947-1950s] people were inundated with reports of sightings almost every day.
The general consensus of those thinking about them was either the things were a new kind of meteorological phenomenon, an aircraft prototype of the United States or Soviet Russia, or visitors from outer space, people from another planet flying here, non-stop to see what's going on.
“Zoam Chomsky” insists, seriously, that UFOs have never been and never were, even during the height of their apparent reality. And UFO skeptics have tried to make the phenomenon a scientific slattern from the beginning
Harvard’s Donald Menzel wrote that flying saucers were meteorology of some kind and Philip Klass gerrymandered for the Zoam Chomsky position: flying saucers did not exist.
Pilots were chasing chimera and people were seeing things.
Today, we have no vibrant promoter of UFOs, as was the situation early on in the phenomenon’s appearance, when Ray Palmer, Donald Keyhoe and UFO enthusiasts like Stanton Friedman and Aimé Michel made headlines with their zeal about the enigmatic appearance of odd things spotted in the skies by people all over the world
Nick Redfern did a piece for Mysterious Universe referring to Jacque Vallee’s Messengers of Deception and John Keel’s UFOs: Operation Trojan Horse and lauding Mac Tonnies posthumous book Cryptoterrestrials.
Vallee’s book is a must read as is John Keel’s work, which appeared when he was still compos mentis.
Mac Tonnies work is a speculation that is rare nowadays.
Such works as those touted by Nick are nowhere to be found today. Sure there are opinionated ruminations all over the place but they are usually pathetic thoughts, produced by non-polymathic authors, who are just overheated UFO wannabes offering their insipid thinking for the residue of UFO oriented chumps still willing to grab a book or two for their paltry collections.
Not only is the UFO phenomenon out of favor with the public and news media, it has become grist for banal science fiction such as the History Channel’s sordid series Project Blue Book.
What appeared to promise insight to existence turned into, almost immediately, a joke and is now fully a product of laughter or avoidance for people who have a taste of intellectual refinement or class.
Skeptics have pretty much won the day.
Recent effort(s) to make UFOs into a topic equivalent to a significant cultural stratum is not only ludicrous. It is an intellectual madness or folly, one like that delineated by Foucault in his books on social maladies we’ve come to call insanity.
The mortem fictem, which is what UFOs have become, is now a rarefied element of social philosophy in some quarters, (See the recent MJ Banias and Bryan Sentes discussion on MJ’s YouTube “station.”)
UFOs are no longer an odd meteorological possibility, nor does any sane person think that the phenomenon is only (or was only) a vaporous imagining affecting radar scopes, (some) video and film, and the eyesight and minds of human beings.
A residue of the lower mental classes still thinks that UFOs are ET craft despite all the scientifically proposed barriers against such delusional thinking.
(The idea of space visitors is exacerbated by films, TV, and books and now social media where the mentally deficient accumulate to infect others with their fantasies and silliness achieving much success in the process.)
Although I think that flying saucers and their offspring, UFOs, had some kind of meaning in the early period of their appearances, the “phenomenon” is now just a shadow of its former self, a pastiche of made-up stories and ill-reported accounts of something seen or interacted with that has become “swamp gas” just as J Allen Hynek suggested in 1966.
RR

9 Comments:
"A residue of the lower mental classes still thinks that UFOs are ET craft despite all the scientifically proposed barriers against such delusional thinking."
Most of the visible ETH boosters today are stupid. We're in agreement on that. But your statement seems to imply that only an idiot or a nut (or an idiotic nut) could still accept the ETH. Richard Hall's 2001 book certainly offers a thoroughly sane and intelligent case for that hypothesis -- what scientific developments have since occurred, such that today acceptance of the ETH is necessarily relegated to the mentally defective?
I don't think any developments of that kind have happened, hence why the chair of Harvard's astronomy department recently contended that an ET probe may have entered our solar system: http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/astronomer-avi-loeb-on-the-interstellar-body-oumuamua-a-1246803.html. This tells against various overly confident arguments to the effect that interstellar ET travel should be dismissed as impossible. Most people saying this have no idea what they're talking about.
By
Anonymous, at Saturday, February 16, 2019
Matty:
I think that interstellar travel is possible, and that there are planets in the Universe that contain advanced life.
My point remains that a traveling, intelligent species from afar would NOT be coming here in the droves that UFO reports/sightings indicate.
And species fixated on the Earth, in the numbers suggested, would not be advanced, as I see it.
They would be like a swarm of bees going after one source of honey.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, February 16, 2019
I think those considerations are reasonable, Rich. But they're not scientific, as you alleged the key reasons for excluding the ETH are in your post above. Rather, they're based on appeals to what might be called common sense, or to intuitions about what constitutes a plausible behavioral model of advanced spacefaring aliens.
By
Anonymous, at Saturday, February 16, 2019
Ah, common sense, Matty...
A thing that doesn't work when it comes to UFOs.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Saturday, February 16, 2019
Hahaha...UFO Makes no common sense..as yet! No matter what you think, or say, but still interesting to read what Matty & other have to say..Good point though Matty!........
By
Daniel, at Saturday, February 16, 2019
I agree with your comments on the meaninglessness of UFOs today. There is so much crap on UFOs and extraterrestrials to be found on the internet and YouTube these days, everything from women engaging in reptilian orgies to self-professed time-travellers and secret space cadets, that I am getting turned off even bothering to follow UFOlogy anymore. Similar, the number of self-professed ghost-hunters and their often idiotic ghost hunts on YouTube and the like is turning me off bothering about anything paranormal. UFOlogy has also become meaningless in that not only are sightings down, there are still no definitive answers forthcoming and UFOlogy having been through the contactee, abductee, conspiracy phases etc., what else is there left but idle speculation?
By
Dracula van Helsing, at Sunday, February 17, 2019
There are scholars currently researching UFOs, but they are studying humans, not aliens.
I recommend historian Greg Eghigian, who has a couple UFO papers in academic journals, and is working on a book.
By
Terry the Censor, at Sunday, February 17, 2019
> A residue of the lower mental classes still thinks that UFOs are ET craft
We live in a world where flat earth believers are resurgent online, especially YouTube. Many others insist most world leaders are pedophiles or shape-changing lizards. A surprising number of unlettered people make a living by preaching online that God will end the world soon -- even though such predictions have failed every single time, for hundreds of years.
But baseball is back, so I'm not down!
By
Terry the Censor, at Sunday, February 17, 2019
well a case like Socorro did provide fodder for the ET theory, and when those inexplicable events come along every decade, it allowed the ET idea to stay 'at the top' so to speak. So I wouldn't criticize the masses too much. It does seem like the 'exciting years' are a distant memory never to return. A lot of things come and go, we just cant bear to let go of our youth and the idea that Martians are mutilating our cattle :)
By
jamesrav, at Friday, February 22, 2019
Post a Comment
<< Home