UFO Conjectures

Saturday, January 28, 2023

Tim Hebert's MUFON Report as our process would rework it

An example of what our Analytics program would do to a report like that which Tim analyzed and provided as an example of his approach. Here is his URL for his exquisite evaluation:

https://timhebert.blogspot.com/2015/01/an-analysis-of-recent-mufon-case.html

We are not interested in UFO sightings as such but in those encounter stories presented by Albert Rosales vast library of them, many also offered by Preston Dennett, and those illustrated by Jose Caravaca in his books.

But as an example of what our process would do to UFO stories, here is an "edited" copy of Tim's MUFON report as we'd cleanse it of extraneous materials for our purpose:

" my girlfriend and I witnessed an extremely bright hovering object, amber in color. a better view of it over the treetops and witnessed what looked like a triangular light pattern -- one very large, very bright amber light in the nose and a smaller flashing light on each wingtip and center which stayed illuminated but strobed brighter in order from left to right.. Because it was so far away we could not make out any structure. The large light was unlike anything we had seen in the sky before in terms of its size and brightness. 

we saw the object again, hovering back close to its original position. It was much closer

The object was very close. I would compare it to watching a plane in take-off pass overhead in terms of its distances. it stopped hovering and began moving -- drifting might be a more fitting verb -- across the sky towards us. the object passed directly overhead. As it did we both witnessed the solid black outline of an equilateral diamond: a small white running light in the center and at each tip with an over-sized, amber-colored seemingly directional (forward to forward-down) light at its nose and a significantly dimmer light on its tail. The three lights from wingtip to wingtip constantly strobed in a right-to-left direction as it moved away from us. The object was silent as it passed over and disappeared
 

continue watching it but  it was nowhere in sight -- until we happened to catch the faint strobe of the object now a great distance away.We watched this object glide back and forth across the sky at a great distance --. her mother came outside to watch it pass at about 45 degrees above the horizon close enough to make out the triangular front of the object. We kept noticing that it seemed to pass in a straight line until we could not see it anymore and then begin its trajectory again from where it started -- but we never saw it fly back. We assumed that we simply missed its return path. Finally we watched one disappear into the distance and made sure to watch for its return. It never flew back. Suddenly it was once again close.  faint strobe of the object now a great distance away.We watched this object glide back and forth across the sky at a great distance -- -- for over an hour.

We tracked the object as it passed about 60 degrees above the horizon when suddenly we noticed a second, identical object flying towards us from a great distance. We continued watching these two objects pass back across the sky.

The total sighting lasted from 9:20pm to 10:45pm.

End of submitted report."

This is only the information needing analysis. Personal and unnecessary details emended.

We will highlight any information found in other accounts -- our encounter reports only -- which were like or similar to information in other non-related reports.

To include flight data, weather data, personal information, psychological information, and other details outside or peripheral to a supposed "alien: encounter is not what we propose to do.

Also, and importantly so, UFO sightings like that "edited" above have no purpose for our attempt to find credible, unusual (unique) similarities in, at least, enough reported tales to make a case for the reality of a strange encounter of a person or being who is not of our known reality.

Getting sidetracked by "data" and asides that do not attain to our purpose for this endeavor is not acceptable to the young computer wizards I've asked to do this.

RR

4 Comments:

  • Thanks for taking a look. It appears that your system heavily weights the witnesses description of the event, ie the subjective interpretation. Which is fine by me. Assuming that you would be correlating description of shape, speed, light sequence, etc with other reports. Again, thanks for plugging my analysis into your system.

    By Blogger Tim Hebert, at Saturday, January 28, 2023  

  • Tim,

    We're not examining UFOs but the encounter sequences reported by Rosales, Dennett, and Caravaca, so the shape, speed, light sequence. etc. is not relevant to what we're looking for.

    The UFO data info has been done to death, to no avail.

    It's not something I planned to tap into or pursue.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Saturday, January 28, 2023  

  • I understand...thanks for the clarification. Looking forward to more of the analytics in your process.

    By Blogger Tim Hebert, at Sunday, January 29, 2023  

  • The Data gatherers would do well to emulate your approach Tim.

    They have tried to wend their way into the UFO secret by pressing the technical data presented by witnesses, who are pretty much guessing at what they're seeing: speed, altitudes. size etc.

    This hasn't worked and doesn't get at the UFO source.

    Trying to gather a few constants found in a large number of credible encounter tales (reports) might tell us if we're dealing with a truly "alien" (or "other") presence.

    But even then, the wheat has to be separated from the chaff -- the noise removed from all of the signal.

    I think my guys' algorithms help us gather the right information, so long as we don't get captured by the "data obsessed" -- data usually found in those errant observations: speed, size or distance.

    In the encounter cases, where people think they've interacted with a UFO humanoid, we might find some common linkages that tell us if they have or not, in a real sense.

    There are hundreds of reports sitting idly without examination or analysis.

    While such fictive-like stories are rancid with human imaginary input, some have to be accurate pretty much, and that's what we're looking for: details that are corroborated by a few others, all from reliable human sources.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Sunday, January 29, 2023  

Post a Comment

<< Home