Preston Dennett put his on FB. What are we to make of such observations? (They come from "normal" and credible witnesses)
posted by RRRGroup at
Tuesday, January 31, 2023
About
About Me
- Name: RRRGroup
- Location: Ann Arbor/Fort Wayne, Michigan/Indiana, United States
A group of media fellows
Previous
- The Observer: my pals there are always on topic (a...
- Worrisome fad?
- What are we doing?
- You can’t just tell a UFO story with no there there
- Tim Hebert's MUFON Report as our process would rew...
- A search for substantive information (not statisti...
- Brilliant minds, more brilliant UFOs
- The proof is not in the photographic pudding when ...
- The Iraqi "blob" continues to show up in new items...
- Ancient Origins provided this story 1/26 and it ta...
3 Comments:
Unfortunately, there is not much that can be gleamed from what was given. Odd, yes, but enlightening...no.
By
Tim Hebert, at Tuesday, January 31, 2023
BTW...Dennett did the drawing not one of the two alleged women which would have been slightly more interesting...I hesitate to use "slightly."
By
Tim Hebert, at Tuesday, January 31, 2023
Yep, second-hand sketches are maybe more about the artist than the witnesses. Unfortunately, amateur artists and photographers are the bane of ufology. (Well, hoaxers too.)
By
Ron, at Tuesday, January 31, 2023
Post a Comment
<< Home