Copyright 2013, InterAmerica, Inc.
When one reads historical or quasi-historical material from
earlier times (B.C. through early A.D. years), they will find mentions (asides)
that replicate UFO sightings or events of our time, the modern era.
Such asides are passingly presented, as if they are
tangential to what’s being related. But why are they mentioned at all?
For instance, in The Barbarian Invasions of The Roman
Empire, Volume II, The Huns and the Vandals by Thomas Hodgkin [Folio Society,
London, 2000] one will find, by scrupulous attention to the text, that odd
(actual?) events are sprinkled throughout.
Some of the history presented comes from such activity of
early monarchs as Che-Hwang-te who, following the Chow Dynasty – his the Tsin
Dynasty – in the 3rd Century B.C. destroyed all the earlier
histories to “cleanse” the past of corrupted stories, thus removing much that
came from oral traditions, providing what may be considered a more accurate
accounting of human (in this case, Chinese) historical accounts.
Other accounts come from sources such as the Alexandrian
Chronicles composed during the reign of Heraclius about 630 A. D. but many of
doubtful authority.
One can assume that they are sometimes reading rather accurate
renderings of what transpired and is being presented as true history – one can
assume – but then …
So what does one make of such things as this:
The Bishop of Tongers in Belgium, Servatius by name,
implored God, amidst fastings and watchings and constant showers of tears, that
he [God] would never permit ‘the unbelieving and ever-unworthy nation of the
Huns’ to enter Gaul. Feeling sure in his spirit that this prayer was not
granted [interesting intuition?], he sought the tomb of the apostle Peter at Rome,
and there, after three days’ fasting pressed his suit. The apostle appeared to
him in a vision…(offering no consolation whatsoever, which sent Servatius to
his home, where he prepared for his death which, indeed, took place). [From
Gregory of Tours, Historia Francorum, ii.5] (Page 72 of Folio book)
Or this:
Meanwhile the consternation within the city of Orleans went
on increasing, as the citizens saw their walls crumbling in ruin beneath the
blows of the battering-rams of Attila [the Hun]. One day, when they were
fervently praying in the church, ‘Anianus said, “Look forth from the ramparts
see if God’s mercy yet succors us.” They gazed forth from the wall, but beheld
no man. He sais, “Pray in faith; the Lord will liberate you today.” They went
on praying; again he bade them mount the walls, and again they saw no help
approaching … When their prayer was ended, a third time … they mounted the
wall, and looking forth they saw from
afar, as it were, a cloud rising out of the ground.
(Attila was foiled in his attempt to take Orléans) [From Apollinaris, Panegyric of Avitus, 328-356, considered a doubtful authority ]
(Page 75 ff. in the Folio book)
While many of such account have a religious patina, but only
because that is the mental patina of the times; what other frame of reference
did early humans/historians/story-tellers have?
The question is why such interventions were interpolated in
these “historical renderings”?
One reason, postulated by historical scholars, is that
divine interventions were used to enhance the persons being remembered and,
also, the person hoping they are remembered.
But is that always true? Is it possible that “visions” and
“clouds rising from the ground” actually took place? After all, such inserts,
as I’ve mentioned, are often peripheral to the stories, or subdued.
It’s as if the intercession is just a minor adjunct to what
has taken place, or is it the crux of the story?
How can we know? And how does this factor in to modern UFO
accounts, which rarely, nowadays, has a true religious overlay?
Yes, technology has pretty much replaced divinity as the
deus et machina of UFO reports but, still, there is a mystery why intrusions
take place at all, in situ, hallucinatorily, or even actually.
UFO interventions, even if just by sight – no encounters –
helped the ancients (Moses, Alexander, Constantine, et al.) achieve whatever
goals they had in mind.
Today, UFO interventions do nothing, but stymie fans of odd
phenomena.
UFOs have become silly, either by our interpretations, or in
reality.
What caused the change?
RR