The non-Logic of (some) UFO sightings/reports

Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.

My pal Kevin Randle posted a piece on his blog [kevinrandle.blogspot.com] about the 1952 Tremonton, Utah photos taken by Navy Warrant Officer Delbert Newhouse.

Kevin’s rumination caused me to think about how I evaluate UFO sightings (or reports).

In this instance, the large numbers of supposed UFOs seen in the Newhouse film would have to be showing an armada of alien (ET) spacecraft or something else.

I ruled out, long ago, that there would be a flotilla of space craft flying about in the American skies.

Where did they come from? Did each arrive separately? Did they emerge from a very large mothership, close by but not pictured by Newhouse?

Were they, in my today thinking, drones or “ships” sent forth from something not that far away from Earth, to check out this planet? (A waste of “inventory” it seems to me, unless an advanced civilizations from elsewhere doesn’t regard or have need of economics.)

The sheer number of “things” filmed rules out, for me, any technology of intelligent design, thus leaving a flock of birds as the most probable source of the images, even with the film-taker and others saying that when the “things” were first seen, closer to them, they had disk-shapes or oval configurations.. (Kevin deals with  the bird issue.)

Looking at other flying saucer reports, such as Ken Arnold’s iconic nine flying disks cavorting near Mount Rainier in 1947, again I’m distressed by the idea that some unearthly species might have been sending a coterie of “ships” to reconnoiter our skies.

Nine flying saucers whipping around a mountain had to come forth from a dispensary ship or else they flew from elsewhere engaged in group (tactical) maneuvers along the way, continuing their mission or sport when they got here.

The scenario(s) don’t make sense to me: they bespeak a nutty intrusion by a supposedly advanced alien (ET) species, again without economic restraint or intelligent plans. They were showing off, as Bruce Maccabee’s recent book implies without Bruce saying so.

As for Roswell, if an advanced space ship or two crashed near Roswell, after making it all the way from the outer reaches of the cosmos, I am shocked. Could technologically advanced spacecraft be downed by Earth lightning or storms, or even a radar sweep?

But if they came forth from a mothership or carrying craft, why didn’t that toting craft and its necessary crew retrieve the crashed ship and/or its crew?

Was the advanced species, responsible for the visiting space ship, an unemotional, indifferent brand of extraterrestrials that lets its life forms fend for themselves when or if they meet disaster or distress?

And then there’s Socorro.

Let me dispense with the vicissitudes of that beleaguered UFO event, only to question why an advanced species would place a symbol or insignia on its visiting craft, just as our military people do with their aircraft?

And what about that blue flame coming from the ship as it sped away from Police Officer Zamora’s debilitated eyes? (Officer Zamora had dropped his glasses when the ship departed, much in the way that an Earthship would.)

Okay, I could go on and on beating such (in)famous UFO sightings with my very inadequate whip, but I’ll leave these sightings (reports) for the skeptics to tear asunder.

I’m just writing that a few UFO cases come at me, right off the bat, as flawed from the get-go.

Yet, I’m baffled and intrigued by many UFO tales just as loopy or more so than those listed here.

Why? They seem to foretell a flaw in human reality or the human mind.

RR