Freud and sexuality plus a view of ethicality/morality
Copyright 2020, InterAmerica
The Super Bowl Half-Time show provoked a hot and heavy
back-and-forth at Facebook via a media friend of mine’s posting.
And those who saw it surely would have seen the “performance”
as a prime example of Freud’s thesis that sexuality is the underpin- ning of
society and human behavior.
I won’t elaborate, because the matter is clear to those with
the awareness that Freud’s genius remains intact and again on the
rise among cognoscenti.
I also got (and saw it on Facebook too) what seems to be
note about how one should not throw out the baby with the bathwater when it
comes to moral or ethical lapses, even those of a serious kind, which I dealt
with here a short while ago.
The person offering the comment(ary) think there’s gold,
even inside the offerings from one who debases society and humanity with
egregious beliefs or actions, such as Heidegger’s anti-Semitism.
Yes, Heidegger was brilliant but intellectually flawed by
his anti-Semitism.
His anti-Semite views indicate a serious glitch in his
thinking, which like a virus, impacted the whole of his thought, even if one
wants to salvage something worthwhile by grubbing among the “philosophers”
output.
The point is that one will be sidelined by an attempt to
find the person free of moral or ethical taint.
No one is free of some kind of “sin” – not even Freud.
But such lapses as that of Heidegger is beyond the pale. He
should have known better, his views exacerbating the Jewish slaughter that the
Nazi’s, at the will of Hitler, brought decimation upon the whole of Judaism and the Jewish
peoples, innocent and pure among them.
(This, again, goes to my view that those in the UFO community who
traverse moral and ethical behavior, sinfully, have to be weighed with an
evaluation of how serious their infractions are.
Most are harmless and trivial,
in the great scheme of things. So, let's not get bogged down by ufological
mischief. It really doesn’t matter; it’s just time-consuming trying to sort out
what’s true and what isn’t.)
As for hanging on to those who have transgressed real
ethical and moral boundaries, they can be discarded totally. Keeping them
“alive” is abetting their miscreant behavior and thought, even if there are
some nuggets of gold within their hard-hearted oeuvre.
So, to those who keep flogging Freud or lauding persons like
Hei- degger, give it a rest.
RR
