J. Allen Hynek’s astute (even profound) statement about UFOs
Copyright 2020, InterAmerica, Inc.
While perusing the ephemeral UFO pages and groups on Facebook, I saw a clip of J. Allen Hynek’s face, subtitled by quotes from him, one being that when the UFO explana- tion finally springs forth (if it ever does), it will tell us exactly what our reality truly is.
And talking about drift, the wayward activity of UFOers
lately (and usually?) goes to the heart of why Doctor Hynek’s “plea” goes ever
more unanswered.
While perusing the ephemeral UFO pages and groups on Facebook, I saw a clip of J. Allen Hynek’s face, subtitled by quotes from him, one being that when the UFO explana- tion finally springs forth (if it ever does), it will tell us exactly what our reality truly is.
I didn’t grab the clip, as I usually would – the pandemic
nonsense befuddling me (see post below) – so if anyone knows the quote and
where it’s from, please leave a comment here, won’t you?. [Thanks].
I’ve been trying to make that point for some time here.
With all the AATIP Navy videos usurping UFO enthusiasts,
some who should know better, UFOs, themselves have been left in the dust.
The AATIP videos relieve UFO-ET believers, even though the
videos don’t really offer an extraterrestrial explanation. They just provide
circumstantial evidence that something exotic and beyond current Earthian
aircraft development exists.
I’m noticing that in the literary review periodicals I
subscribe to, that there are more and more books appearing that delve into
reality speculations and consciousness theories.
There seems to be a drift back to mind and consciousness as
material rather than ethereal constructs.
Phenomenology and Cognitive Psychology are getting
work-overs. [See TLS, March 20, 2020, Page 28 ff. review of The
Oxford Handbook of Cognition]
And while those topics are grist for academics, they do
little to explain UFOs or even paranormal ingredients, academics studying their
methods and not things that would usually be on the table for scientific
scrutiny.
This is the problem for ufologists or UFO enthusiasts too. Their “object” of study has been and continues to remain so elusive that it can’t be studied or examined and thus is not unlike that which phenomenologists and cognitive psychologists deal with.
This is the problem for ufologists or UFO enthusiasts too. Their “object” of study has been and continues to remain so elusive that it can’t be studied or examined and thus is not unlike that which phenomenologists and cognitive psychologists deal with.
Getting our hands on -- a metaphor for gathering concrete,
material aspects of UFOs, not just data or historical remembrances, reports,
and hypotheses -- might go a long way to telling us what UFOs are and have
been, and what reality we are subject to,
I am not alone in this quest for a diligent study of how to
explain UFOs or get our “hands on” one.
J. Allen Hynek also wished for the same, God rest his soul.
(And alleged “crashed flying saucers do not exist, never
have, never will. UFOs are something more, much more.)
RR






