Pardon me?
In my recent harangues about Robbie Graham’s new book, UFOs:
Reframing the Debate, I hit a nerve with some of the people who are
contributors therein.
I changed the blog title that caused them some angst and
hurt.
But my pique about the so-called Graham “reframing” remains
intact.
Robbie was, in my obtuse opinion, cavalier about whom he
chose to offer suggestions for recasting the UFO debate.
That’s it.
You can follow my thinking, if it is thinking – one of my
critical “friends” feels I have gone off the reservation – in subsequent posts
here about the Graham book and the state of ufology, supplemented by
Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos’ erudite presentation, linked here (below in its
own post), about how ufology has failed to produce anything substantial about
the enigmatic phenomenon.
RR
