UFO debris: a worthless sidebar, but not the only one
But that’s it. Nothing more comes from any information about UFOs other than they are solid manifestations composed of metal (or some exotic material) indicating intelligent manufacture.
Who or what constructed the things, from where or why, remains in speculative limbo.
What’s inside a UFO, if there is an inside, is much more valuable as a discernment of what they are, or from whence they come.
Ufologists and serious UFO enthusiasts – there are no actual researchers – pursue the phenomenon as if it’s something eva- nescent, which it may be, but only insofar as we have come to know the phenomenon.
UFOs as a concrete, hands-on something remains elusive.
José Carvaca dealing with the psychic manifestation and a UFO veneer writes this in his new book:
But the actual, material-like “craft” is where the real answer to the UFO phenomenon lies.
(The so-called abduction accounts can be dismissed, out-of-hand as near schizophrenic behavior or deliria oneirica as I’ve already noted here.)
So, UFO debris and encounter scenarios, while interesting, provide nothing to explain the phenomenon as it exists as a real, solid entity, with import of a kind or kinds that mean something pertinent to our reality.
Fooling around with the side-bars of ufology is a time-consuming waste of energy and various resources. UFO enthusiasts like to pretend they are on the case.
But they aren’t.
RR

