Jose Caravaca corrects my inclination to make his Distortion Theory into a purposeful effort by a personified "External Agent"
Copyright 2019, José Antonio Caravaca
Dozens of researchers point out that the UFO paradigm has little or nothing to do with the hypothetical presence of aliens on our planet, and that the cases offer us a multitude of clues that indicate that the phenomenon has an extraordinary "psychological" component embedded in it. And going deeper into this premise, the theory of distortion wants to go even further, dissecting the cases and trying to find hidden clues.
UFO researchers can only study the "during", since the "before" and "after" to the projection simply do not exist. And it is because of this "psychic mechanism" that, to date, we have not been able to establish many solid conjectures about UFOs, since their action is spontaneous, not premeditated, and actually orchestrated, not by the phenomenon itself, but by the creativity of each witness who interacts with the external agent. Everything is "created" and "projected" at the very moment of the conjunction of the human psyche with this unknown detonator, from the aesthetics of the presumed aliens to their behaviour.
DISTORTION THEORY: FROM THE GLOBAL TO THE INDIVIDUAL
If tomorrow a spaceship landed in the White House gardens before the target of
thousands of smartphones, and the existence of extraterrestrial life was
officially confirmed, it would still be difficult for us to explain the
thousands of UFO incidents reported in the last 7 decades.
And the fact is that the UFO phenomenon presents several
unknowns that are difficult to solve, even though we have on the table the certainty of extraterrestrial reality.
Above all, because in their numerous appearances UFOs
present aspects apparently irreconcilable with our science since they seem to
be half physical and half psychic phenomena, as if they were manifesting in a
blurred border between the real and the imaginary.
But why do we say this? A multitude of reports illustrate
the existence of, apparently, hundreds of alien races different in height,
physical appearance, clothing, etc., in addition to a fleet of flying saucers
of the most diverse and bizarre shapes and sizes, not to mention the absurd and
disconcerting behaviour shown on countless occasions by the elusive UFO crew
who seem to be mad or have a great sense of humour.
As if this intergalactic gibberish were not enough,
ufologists have not been able to compose a global plot that can unite in a
single and coherent story at least a dozen of these incidents, the cases where
extrasensory perceptions, telepathic contacts, strange dreams, paranormal
phenomena, poltergeist, etc. are registered that completely confuse our initial
and simplistic perception of the question.
It is as if the UFO phenomenon were restarted in each
episode showing infinite and unpredictable variations of the same concept;
alien visitation. But what are we dealing with? Are we dealing with
extraterrestrial astronauts or are we dealing with something else?
Dozens of researchers point out that the UFO paradigm has little or nothing to do with the hypothetical presence of aliens on our planet, and that the cases offer us a multitude of clues that indicate that the phenomenon has an extraordinary "psychological" component embedded in it. And going deeper into this premise, the theory of distortion wants to go even further, dissecting the cases and trying to find hidden clues.
And after a detailed analysis of hundreds of events, we have
concluded that UFO appearances and close encounters are the product of an
elaborate "psychic architecture" that arises as a consequence of the
connection between an unknown external agent and the mind of witnesses. And as
a result of this tuning, a three-dimensional image is "projected",
indistinguishable from the reality that surrounds it, which contains all the
elements described in a UFO encounter.
Although we must be clear that most of this scenography
would be constructed from the psychic material that the external agent extracts
from the psyche of the observers (memories, hobbies, culture, etc.). Therefore,
this would explain, from the outset, why most incidents are intangible and of
ephemeral appearance, where the "occupants" and their
"machines" leave no traces and can pass through the objects.
UFO events are unpredictable beyond the basic skeletal
report that is recorded in almost all incidents: "something" will be
seen in the sky, will land and from this "something" its occupants
will descend. But little more can be anticipated, since the content of the
experiences will be "aesthetically" different from one narrative to
another, as the characters (humanoids, entities, occupants...) and objects
(flying saucer, suits, pistols...) of the projection are transformed by the
individual participation of each witness.
So, as it is a projection "manufactured" at the
very moment of the connection with the external agent, nothing that happened
during a UFO experience obeys an empirical reality, nor does it have a
physical continuity in our universe after the encounter has ended. In other
words, the humanoids, the ship and the actions recorded in a UFO episode do not
have a real existence, beyond their ephemeral presence during the projection
before the witnesses. And, therefore, nothing reported will ever exactly repeat
itself in another UFO event, simply because nothing represented exists outside
the "projection" created for the occasion. And in an upcoming UFO
encounter, by changing the "source" (the witness) from which the main
visual elements that make up the projection emerge, the experience is almost
restarted from scratch.
UFO researchers can only study the "during", since the "before" and "after" to the projection simply do not exist. And it is because of this "psychic mechanism" that, to date, we have not been able to establish many solid conjectures about UFOs, since their action is spontaneous, not premeditated, and actually orchestrated, not by the phenomenon itself, but by the creativity of each witness who interacts with the external agent. Everything is "created" and "projected" at the very moment of the conjunction of the human psyche with this unknown detonator, from the aesthetics of the presumed aliens to their behaviour.
In each ufological episode we witness the resumption of the
concept of "extraterrestrial visitation" under the particular
"optics" of each witness who greatly modifies the internal skeleton
that defines this paradigm (extraterrestrial ship and occupant) and its
markedly absurd component, baptized by the brilliant researcher Ignacio
Darnaude as a "cosmic theatre.” with actions and dialogues lacking in
logic.
This would be the consequence of this shared mental creation
in a process similar to the one reproduced during the stages of sleep. And they
would have no other meaning beyond being products of an elaborate psychic
process. Therefore, close encounters with UFOs are unpredictable phenomena.
Therefore, it has been an egregious error to analyze and compare the UFO
casuistry as a whole, which clearly presents absurd and disconnected episodes,
since the true meaning of these experiences can only be interpreted/decoded at
an individual level, case by case, taking into account the unconscious
influence of the witness in its conformation.
Only by understanding that these are global experiences, but
subjectivized by the active participation of the psyche of each witness, will
we remove all mystery from these encounters. The presence or non-presence
of matter in incidents, which causes traces or quantifiable effects on the
environment or people, would be determined by the capacity of each witness to
"energize" his or her encounter so that parts of it were apparently
real.
In this way, understanding that observers participate very
actively in what is observed, as co-creators of the phenomenon, they are not
mere spectators. Before the staged elements are put on stage -- footprints,
burns, injuries, etc. – they are in the psyche of the spectator.
And what or who originates this phenomenon? Regarding the
origin of these manifestations, we can say that, over the centuries, under
different labels, human beings have had various encounters with creatures,
entities and unknown beings (demons, angels, fairies, demons, monstrous
creatures, etc.) that probably obey this same phenomenon, which has been
modified over time.
And this modification or evolution in its external
appearance, therefore, does not provide
a perfect camouflage of the phenomenon but is the fruit of the own
participation by the human being in its creation. Since it cannot be otherwise,
all the apparitions, in their different contexts, are synchronic with the
interests, advances and culture of the time.
In the same way that the information obtained from these
manifestations does not cease to be mere distortions of human concepts and
ideas. The external agent serves as a perfect catalyst for our psyche to have
sporadic "contacts" with another reality that escapes our ordinary
senses. From those unexplored dimensions, which coexist with ours, the external
agent would be trying, through multiple and different contacts, to communicate
with human beings (individually) to show us dormant aspects of our consciousness,
or perhaps just serve as a covert guide to a vast and unknown cognitive
universe.
So far we are only perceiving the "inferences"
caused by our uncontrolled immersion in this journey to the depths of the other
side.
JAC
