The rage has subsided?
The loss of a Roswell “explanation” (those slides, of course) caused some in the UFO community to vent their spleen, in ways that
haven’t been seen since the Alien Autopsy brouhaha.
Vituperation emerged from the id, much as that depicted in
Forbidden Planet (from the Krell):
There is a residue of semi-psychotic rage, repressed
usually, among members of the UFO community, but where does that repressed rage
come from?
Only a psychoanalytic session can really tell us.
Yet, we often have to deal with it, in comments here and
elsewhere in UFOland.
David Rudiak called for UFO-blog commenters to use their
real names, to quit hiding behind nom de plumes, aliases, or alter egos.
I agree.
One can discern much from an avatar used by commenters
online. But why should we have to?
Many show up at Kevin Randle’s blog and Isaac Koi’s
AboveTopSecret site, and a few here, but this blog tries to stick with those
who use their real names to make public pronouncements: CDA (whom we all know
as long-time UFO enthusiast, Brit, Christopher Allen), Lance Moody, Bruce
Duensing, Paul Kimball, Nick Redfern, David Rudiak (himself), Kevin (of
course), Gilles Fernandez, Jose Caravaca, Zoam Chomsky (yes, we know who that
really is – The Iron Skeptic!), and many others).
It’s the hidden-identity group that causes trouble – not so
much those who use “handles” at AboveTopSecret, a usually benign group – but,
rather, a slew of others who come forth upon UFO “conversations” to rattle
cages and/or spew venom because of their suppressed (or repressed) rage.
I have a recent e-mail, from a guy who used to post here –
it’s a prime example of psychotic rage (which I’ve shared with Lance Moody and
Nick Redfern).
The fellow needs counseling, surely, but will not get it, as
he thinks he’s normal and psychologically healthy.
My position is to delete or ignore comments from the sick
element, generally, or to call them out when they go too far with their
expletives that indicate derangement.
But Mr. Rudiak’s suggestion – use your real name online –
would go a long way to assuaging vitriol and id impulse commentary in UFO
circles.
It’s not a cure-all but would help.
Now that the ire (about the May 5th thing) has
diminished pretty much, maybe we can go forward with dialogue that makes
“ufology” the fun, stupid thing is was always meant to be.
I hope so, anyway.
RR


