UFO Conjectures

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Ufological Fideism

Get ready for trouble...

"Fideism claims that truths of a certain kind can be grasped only by foregoing rational inquiry and relying solely on faith. Insofar as fideism insists that knowledge of these truths is possible, it must be distinguished from various forms of skepticism with which it otherwise shares certain common features."

RR

The “mystery” of selectivity and the calculation of exploitation (with UFOs et cetera)

Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.
A new book that I’m going to provide more on, upcoming, is the basis for this conjectural posting…

Believing in Order to See: On the Rationality of Revelation and the Irrationality of Some Believers (Perspectives in Continental Philosophy) by Marion, Jean-Luc [Fordham University Press; Translation edition, April 3, 2017]

Obviously, for serious UFO enthusiasts, UFO sightings and encounters that have become iconic in the lore, have make their presence known to loners or inside select, hidden or sedate milieux.

That is, the UFO phenomenon is a lonely observed phenomenon, usually. UFOs, the prominent UFOs found or highlighted in the literature, don’t appear to the great unwashed masses but generally to a select individual or two.

Persons seeing or interacting with UFOs are solitary or in a solitary environment. What does this tell us?

Like the Biblical prophets of The Jewish Bible or the visions of Muhammad and the Saints of theology, along with the “hallucinations” of adepts, ancient and more recent, UFO witnesses experience things that really only pertain to them.

(This observation -- UFO witnesses experience things that really only pertain to them – goes to the heart of Jose Caravaca’s Distortion Theory, often lauded here, but I’ll forego the theory for the moment.)

When one reads (or studies) the odd accounts from individuals who think they see and, thus, report, weird things – UFOs, Big Foot, ghosts, sea monsters, et al. – those individuals lack, as I’ve noted several times (to the dismay of some) sophistication petty much.

They are (UFO witnesses, paranormal witnesses, et al.) simple folk usually, naïve, not well-educated, ignorant by all standards of intellectualism. That’s harsh but true and verifiable.

Why would this be the case, the reality?

It’s not that such persons lack common sense or worldly intelligence. They are just culturally inept: the visionaries of Christ on the road to Emmaus and the young girls who think they saw the Virgin Mary or the blokes who see Sasquatch in their field of vision, and those who are afflicted by MIB, just like those who thought they were attacked by “Spring Heel Jack” in the 1800s or the many who believed they saw Airships just before the turn of the 20th Century.

What causes these nondescript persons to have such visions/experiences? It’s got to be something in their DNA or a neurological “disease” that has captured their mental faculties.

It couldn’t be actuality could it? That is, they couldn’t be privy to such visions or experiences like the Shamans of old, could they?

Most persons seeing UFOs or Big Foot and ghosts, et cetera, haven’t ingested hallucinogenics it seems, as Shamans did (and do).

And this is where exploitation comes in.

Shamans only saw or had (have) visions and insights to other realities because of the use of accoutrements to hallucination: cannabis, psilocybin mushrooms, and other “natural” hallucinogens.

Using those visions, Shamans came to understand, even in their primitive mind-sets, that they could work their tribes and peoples to their wills.

Some will say that Shamans actually had transformative visions, but that is a canard. Shamans were (and are) con-men.

Psychedelics and hallucinogens don’t bring visions of reality but, rather, distort reality and those thinking they have had or had profound visions using LSD or eating certain mushrooms are in that category of madness often elucidated here and by persons more capable that I am to discern that particular insanity.

This takes me to UFO witnesses who like Shamans exploited their visions or sightings, knowing or thinking that they really had a vision of a flying disk or extraterrestrial (or any of the other paranormalities mentioned above).

Some UFO witnesses were brought into the public spotlight against their will: Lonnie Zamora, Frank Mannor (the 1966 Ann Arbor/Dexter “swamp gas” observer), Robert Taylor (recently highlighted here), et al.

While others exploited their sighting or vision/experience: Kenneth Arnold, Betty Hill, the Bentwaters (Rendlesham) crew, et al.

(And then there are the possible hoaxers: Sonny Desvergers, Travis Walton, Whitley Strieber, et al. the modern Shamans.)

Yes, UFOs are seen, or thought to be seen by some innocent observers, selected by God or Jose Caravaca’s “external agent” or just those who have a temporary bout of madness.

Then there are those who have an odd experience, self-induced, who take their experience into the public arena to minor, short-lived acclaim

(And finally we have the hoaxers or mischief-makers, whom we should ignore.)

UFOs open the door to studies of madness or insanity, in a number of ways, and that’s the thrill of ufology for some of us.

RR