The ongoing search for UFOs by the U.S. military

Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.

Kevin Randle, at his blog [kevinrandle.blogspot.com] consistently finds evidence that the U.S. military continued to be involved with UFOs, long after its alleged forfeiture of the phenomenon subsequent to the 1968 Condon report.

And the recent disclosure of the 2007 to 2012 (and ongoing?) Pentagon study of UFOs indicates that some U.S. government or military personnel are still interested in finding out what UFOs are.

Why?

If a crashed flying disc was recovered near Roswell in 1947, or any number of other alleged UFO failures truly occurred, wouldn’t that give a finality to UFO chases, and “full-time research” be the operating procedure of the military establishment(s)?

Yet, UFOs continue to be an obsession with some military circles here in America and in other countries as well.

Such ongoing persistence doesn’t give credence necessarily to the extraterrestrial explanation for the obnoxious enigma, but it does imply that something more than delusional perceptions – my favorite explanation for UFO sightings/encounters – is at work, at least in the mind of military professionals.

Have a go at Kevin’s recent “Moon Dust” find and the accompanying material he’s uncovered to slake your thirst for secret military goings-on, still, when it comes to UFOs.

RR 

UFOs are a subjective reality?

Copyright 2018, InterAmerica, Inc.

Physicist Paul Davies wrote a chapter for the book pictured here.

(It’s a Wallaby book, published in 1979 and I think Davies might have some different views today.)

In his chapter Reality exists outside us? Davies provides an overview of several Quantum physics issues, concluding that “if reality has any meaning at all, it is only in the context of the observer and the observation itself.” [Page 158]

This seems to be the current fashionable stance of Jacques Vallee, Nick Redfern, and other UFO enthusiasts.

And it is a view that I can accept, but not totally.

Yes, all we have as “evidence” for UFOs, which Zoam Chomksy vibrantly insists do not exist in any way, are reports and accounts of observations of them.

Dominick, a rapid UFO believer, counter insists that videos, film and photos, radar returns, and physical traces prove UFOs are a tangible reality.

But Davies in his book chapter, noted above, offers that “an independent reality ‘out there’ has been discredited. We see in its place a shifting world of uncertainty in which apparent realities can come and go in seeming random fashion, and in which even the observer himself has dissolved into something evanescent and insubstantial.” [ibid]

This has to do, in great part, with consciousness, and it’s not until that is resolved can we posit that such “tangible” artifacts and apparent solidity of UFOs, that Dominick refers to, are real.

While Roswellians persist in claiming that remnants or debris of a crashed flying disc were found in New Mexico, there is no “reality” to such a claim. It’s all fantasy or delusion, hyped not even by “observers” but thrust upon society by persons engulfed in sociopathic or psychopathic inclinations, or worse.

And the current meme that the observer is key to the UFO enigma is also a gem of ridiculousness.

Observers are merely relating, as they truthfully believe usually, a personal reality, a subjective reality.

Why? Because there is no “independent reality out there.”

We humans seem to be encapsulated inside a reality that is of our own making or presented to us, as defined, in part, by Spanish UFO researcher Jose Antonio Caravaca’s rather elaborate “Distortion Theory” with its “external agent” – actually an internal neurological agent operating as if outside the human cortex.

(This is where the debate about consciousness intersects with the human biologic realm.)

Reality, and its concomitant connection to UFOs, is a messy, complex topic, about which more will be coming, of course.

RR