Missing the [UFO] forest for the trees

Copyright 2022, InterAmerica, Inc.
 
James Easton, Chris Rutkowski, along with some non-notable UFOers have been debating the 1967 Falcon Lake/Michalak incident, the image here part of the ongoing discussion:

This is the core of the UFO muddle: an old UFO report (or hoax), debated ad infinitum, ad perpetuam, ad nauseum gets us nowhere.
 
The Falcon Lake incident is interesting but could have been a caper or hoax of Stephan Michalak and determining that may clarify the matter but, again, takes us nowhere near determining what UFOs, the phenomenon, may be.
 
The Facebook debate rattles a small cage, but it’s worthless as a UFO topic. Some old UFO reports may be (and are) germane perhaps in leading speculaters to clues that apply to, or could, a UFO denouement.
 
But endless debates, like Easton’s are just worthless pastimes, cleansing the UFO lore of dertritus but going nowhere worthwhile in 2022 and beyond.
 
We’ve moved along, since AATIP. UFOs are. Finding just exactly what they are is where we need to continue to go, not backtrack to musty UFO tales that are now fables.
 
RR

A messy video (with a slight reference to the expected October 31st report) and UAP pluralized again. (Note the irrelevant insertions of the AATIP videos)

 https://youtu.be/U-Fb383XENI 

UFO Magazine loses lawsuit against Showtime: "UFO" can't be trademarked or copyrighted

https://k2radio.com/federal-judge-dismisses-cody-based-ufo-magazine-lawsuit-against-showtime/

Billy Cox on "Where's that October 31st UFO/UAP report to Congress?"

 https://lifeinjonestown.substack.com/p/confusion-at-odni