Ancient aliens or actually “gods”?

Copyright 2021. InterAmerica, Inc.

In the opening hour of the History Channel’s contrived Ancient Alien (Astronaut) series, Friday night [10/22] I found that by substituting the word “gods” for “visitors from the skies” or “extraterrestrial visitors,” the series would have a veracity that is elusive in its present format and presentations.
 
I’m pressing – despite some pushback from a few here (and elsewhere) – for the idea that, as I note in my Substack pages, there was an historical period when there lived on Earth, among humans (and still do perhaps) a race of beings, Earth-born and evolved who came into being differently from the ape families, from which we reading this belong
 
And those Earth-beings, while related to their hominid brothers and sisters, developed along lines that outstripped their primate kin came to be seen as apart and above the whole of mankind, eventually tagged by scholars as mythological gods.
 
But this race of mankind, while unique in development and thought, mingled with primate humans and aided them in developing civilizations or societies, beginning in Sumeria and eventually across the world, in Meso-America, India, et al. which the AA show concentrated on.
 
My caveats? Where did these “gods” come from?
 
Evolutionary? That would need a Darwinian subset or a new creative approach.
 
From a “Designer”? I’m okay with that but most (here) don’t like the idea, it presumes a God.
 
From extraterrestrial seeding? That’s as ludicrous as the AA theorist's suggestion that ETs were the entities noted in human myth and history, and the beings who left examples of their handiwork across the globe.
 
(For me, the idea of extraterrestrials visiting this inconsequential planet is a remote possibility. Even time-travelers or usurpers from a parallel universe is improbable.)
 
Nope. The evidence for a unique human species is palpable – see my Substack pages for examples. This special species are the “gods” of myth, and remnants of them may still be extant, as I try to prove elsewhere.
 
The AA theorist views are interesting. It’s just that they have the wrong premise: ETs visited here in the past. But their “evidence” makes my point,
 
RR

Are the AATIP UFO pilot conversations fake?

Copyright 2021, InterAmerica, Inc.

During Friday night’s History Channel recap of the AATIP UFO videos, I was struck by how the pilot conversations captured during their sightings in 2004 and 2015 were similar in style and wording:
 
"Holy s___, what is that?"
 
“Look at that thing, it's rotating! My gosh! They're all going against the wind, the wind's 120 knots to the west. Look at that thing dude!  [2015]
 
"It's white. It has no wings. It has no rotors."
“Dude, this is a f---ing drone, bro,” [2004]
 
"It didn't fly like an aircraft. It was so unpredictable—high g, rapid velocity, rapid acceleration."
 
"I didn't see a trail."
 
"It was going 70-plus knots underwater."

Look at that thing Dude and Dude, this is a f---ing drone, bro are dialogues with a Top Gun flavor.

And the voices are alike in timbre and tone: both pilots speaking and sounding alike, even though their sightings and verbal captures are 11 years apart.

Something seemed amiss to me and I’m wondering if anyone has checked to see or analyzed the purported transcripts to determine if they are authentic or not.

That is, are the pilot dialogues a concoction, and maybe even the videos themselves worked over and partially contrived to hide some important facets of what was seen and captured on the airplanes’ various systems?

Something doesn’t smell right?

RR