UFO Conjectures

Saturday, July 11, 2020

History's Unidentfied's 2nd Season Premiere

Luis Elizondo is back, hosting the new 2nd season of Unidentified on the History Channel, the show airing Saturday nights at 10 pm....the first one on 7/11/20.

You know I'm partial to Elizondo, and found his AATIP divulgings interesting, to say the least.

The new season is a continuance of his search for more disclosures from airmen and military personnel who have experienced a UFO (or UAP if you wish) as far back as the VietNam war.

I'm also partial to U.S. military men, especially those Luis inter- viewed so far; they all have, to my mind, credibility or veracity, telling what they saw without a patina of farfetchery of any kind.

And in this 2nd season's first episode you come away with a handful of witness sightings that can't be dismissed out of hand or in any other way.

Try to catch the show, It's one of the few that the History Channel gets right.

RR

The 1950 McMinnville “flying saucer” – a real UFO?

Copyright 2020, InterAmerica, Inc.
I’ve presented this sighting and its accompanying photographs many times, and no one has debunked the photographs or the sighting, here, or anywhere.


Yes, It’s an old case but a good one with “evidence” as you can see.

My pal Tony Bragalia had a go at it and presented some circum- stantial material that makes me pause at ballyhooing the episode: compromising photographs that a LIFE photographer gathered with the family of witnesses – the Trents – while doing a story on their sighting and the aftermath.

Neither Tony nor I or anyone else has demolished the episode or the photos, although Bruce Maccabee did a thorough analysis of the photos with no conclusion that made anyone throw the event or photos away.

There was some debate about the shadows seen in the photo- graphs causing a few to dispute the time of day the Trents said they saw and took the pictures of the craft – in the morning vs the late afternoon.

And there was much ado about a truck mirror being the object, hung by a string from the overhead electric wires seen in the photos.

But there has never been a final assertion of the photos validity or the accuracy of the Trent family account.

I’ve presented an awkward analysis of the photos and I think Tony has tried to track down the Trent son, seen in the LIFE photos on a ladder.

Neither has gone anywhere and the case, while a good one – des- pite its age – has not been on the front burner of any UFOer for a long time as fas as I know.

Look at the photos, in the newspaper coverage above. What do you think? I see the craft as moving away from the photographer, Paul Trent, as he said, even though I wondered how he could get into the house, fetch his camera, and grab the two shots. Was the “saucer” lolling along? That seemed odd to me, and still does. But I like the photos and the way they show something flying away, much as an aircraft would.

This is a real case, with some intriguing “evidence” that should be placed among those sightings that give vent to a UFO reality.

RR