UFO Conjectures

Friday, April 21, 2023

That UFO next-step….where is it?

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.
I’m wondering why, with most UFO instances, witnesses, inves- tigators, “researchers” and regular Joes never take that necessary next step to make their point or provide a finality to their premises.
 
For instance, why has no one asked Billy Meier, who is allegedly close to his Plejaren buddies, why they haven’t allowed him per- mission to photograph the inside of one of their visiting spacecraft?
 
Lots of aerial shots but nothing showing the inside of the Plejaren aircraft.
 
(There was, years ago, a brouhaha involving photos of a flying saucer’s innards that some guy got access to. Does anyone recall the details of that skirmish?)
 
I saw an old video of the MUFON “investigation” of the 1897 Aurora, Texas saucer crash in which the MUFON people found the apparent grave site and memorial stone wherein the saucer pilot’s body was laid to rest.
 
During MUFON’s procedures, they asked to exhume the body or, at least, to dig into the grave site. The request was denied by the Cemetery officials or caretakers and subsequently the marker was removed, and graffiti now engulfs the surrounding plot.
 
Why was there no attempt to request an official okay to verify that a body or evidence of that saucer crash be made available? A reasoned case could have been made but MUFON packed up its shovel and spade and returned home, empty-handed and shot down by some rural folks who didn’t understand the import of the MUFON effort.
 
Then there is (or was) some indication (with video substantiation) that one of Mac Brazel’s kids had access to a cave where some Roswell metal was hidden, but the matter just upped and went nowhere.
 
(Back during the heady, crazy Roswell body fiasco, my pal then, Tony Bragalia, told me he was slated to visit Roswell with Tom Carey and Donald Schmitt to gather some metal, apparently from that hiding place. When the Kodak photo farce was brought to light by Lance Moody, Curt Collins, et al., the trip to get the metal was terminated.)
 
There are dozens (many) UFO accounts along with a slew of odd events – Loch Ness or any Bigfoot episode – which are never brought to fruition.
 
It’s akin to Schubert's Unfinished Symphony....frustrating.

Where’s the zeal to get an answer to such things?

(Image atop from Booksie)

RR

Heidegger: An Obscene Philosopher

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.

One of the reasons I set aside my palship with UFO guy Bryan Sentes and then discarded his Liminas group derives from both saluting philo- sopher Martin Heidegger.

A new review in TLS, 4/14, [Page 27] of Heidegger in Ruins by Richard Wolin [Yale Press] notes “Heidegger’s Black Notebooks make it impossible to separate his thinking from his politics"…..the review headline – An obscene philosophy.
 

I won’t delineate the review points except to say, find TLS online and read it for yourself, and find that Heidegger was enthralled with Nazism and was a thorough and despicable anti-semite,
 
As my pal Paul Kimball suggested I quit ballyhooing Jesse Michels because Jesse did a YouTube video with Alex Jones, that guy who debauched the Sandy Hook school shootings and was sued for his screamingly bigoted lie that the shootings were staged, not real, I chastised Bryan and Liminas for promoting Heidegger’s thinking as part of their academic UFO charade.
 
Not to see the egregious evil of Heidegger’s thinking and importing it into the UFO community is intellectual vertigo of a sickening kind.
 
I know that most of you don’t care about such things – as Jesse Michels’ blunder or Bryan Sentes’ lauding the outrageously flawed Heidegger -- but there it is.
 
As Paul Kimball points out, there is no place in the UFO community for such outrageous folly.
 
The phenomenon has enough problems without adding evil people and corrupt thinking to the mix.
 
RR