Ufology: Stuck in a Retro-Stasis
Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.
Most of you reading this know that this blog and others are
“reminiscing” about old UFO sightings, some obscure or unknown and, of course,
the iconic sightings or events: Roswell, Levelland, Socorro, Rendlesham, et
cetera.
I’ve mentioned this many times here: UFO buffs encased in
nostalgia and the earlier sensational flying saucer era that is now all but a
fond memory for UFO old-timers.
But the regression to Roswell and Socorro, et al. is
a sop to the fact that flying saucers no longer exist and UFOs or UAP (or IAP)
and the old UFO cases involve dysfunction of the dopamine system in the brain.
We UFO buffs, some of us, get enlivened by the flying saucer
sightings of our youth or the sightings that spurred us to come to ufological
writings in the first place.
For a few, those who pooh-pooh the constant regurgitation of
the old, classic UFO cases, even they are energized by the onslaught of online
and printed copy about the cases that make them sick.
The stimulus of peeve that old cases showing up all the time
in UFO venues brings is a kind of reward, one that tells pooh-poohers that they
are above the nonsense that engulfs the rest of us who remain regressed by
sightings that no longer matter.
Old-timer CDA understands this and notes the irrelevancy of
Roswell or Socorro, et cetera – sightings that keep being shredded here
and at Kevin Randle’s blog, among others.
CDA insists that nothing of significance happened in 1947
and 1964 and if it did, someone would have spilled the beans by now, but since
no one has, the sightings are blasé stories with little to keep them being flogged
as they are.
But UFO buffs – some rational, some not – keep old cases on
the ufological front-burner.
This is going on right now with the 1964 Socorro sighting by
Police Officer Lonnie Zamora in his hometown and brought up by many in the UFO
community when it is a case that should be put to rest, as CDA indicates. Why?
The Zamora observation proves nothing, and has no denouement
in the offing.
Did Officer Zamora see an extraterrestrial craft? Or an
exotic balloon that stymied his intellect and vison? Did he spot a military
prototype that he nor no one would recognize in 1964? Or was Officer Zamora
gulled by a college prank?
How can we prove any of these things? Are they worthy of being
pursued, now in 2017, no matter which one turns out to be the explanation?
We are wasting our time and lives struggling to explain the
1964 observation. No matter which explanation may be true, and we are far from
any explanation at all, how does it affect us and the UFO phenomenon
(phenomena!) today?
It doesn’t affect us.
It is archaeological and that’s it. Interesting as a
fossilized event, appropriate for UFO partisans of ufological history.
It’s time to move on, to other interests, such as what
reality are we immersed in? Or what will we have for breakfast tomorrow
morning?
RR

