A new Rendlesham Forest witness

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201907291076397377-us-military-vet-sheds-light-on-britains-roswell-ufo-incident/

Nick Redfern: Part Three of his MJ-12/Russian series

https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2019/07/majestic-12-ufos-aids-hiv-and-russian-psychological-warfare/

A sphere encasing a cube?

Copyright 2019, InterAmerica, Inc.

From NY Magazine Intelligencer [May 27, 2019]:

In late 2014, a pilot of a Super Hornet reported a near-collision with a UFO when an object that looked like a “sphere encasing a cube” zipped between two fighter jets flying roughly 100 feet from each other. Another pilot, Lieutenant Danny Accoin, could identify a flying object’s presence on his radar, missile system, and infrared camera but was not able to actually see it in his helmet camera. “I knew I had it, I knew it was not a false hit,” Accoin said. But still, “I could not pick it up visually.”

NY Post [May 27, 2019]:

In late 2014, a Super Hornet pilot said he almost hit one of the objects — which he said looked like a sphere encasing a cube — and an official mishap report was filed.

Daily Galaxy [May 27, 2019]:

The pilot and his wingman were flying in tandem about 100 feet apart over the Atlantic east of Virginia Beach when something flew between them, right past the cockpit. It looked to the pilot, Lieutenant Graves said, like a sphere encasing a cube. The incident so spooked the squadron that an aviation flight safety report was filed, Lieutenant Graves said.

Search Google and you’ll be hard put, as was I, to find any image of a cube encased within a sphere.

The vector drawing atop is a representation for the Rubik’s Cube, only a simulation for the teaser device.

Then there’s this representation of Kepler’s idea of our Solar System:

But that’s it.

The observation by Navy pilot Lieutenant Graves indicates a truly unique visual that tells us something – something significant – about UFOs, but what?

This goes to my plea for “grasping a UFO, technologically," not necessarily physically.

Such “evidence” (as intangible as it may be) bespeaks a clue about UFOs and our reality, despite my pal Bryan Sentes opting for philosophical chatter to break the impasse. (His approach just takes us further away from the UFO enigma, beclouding it in a maelstrom of philosophical hogwash.)

The report(s), as outlined in the news media above, are a starting point for determining just what it is that humans keep seeing, and defining as a UFO, regardless of Zoam Chomsky’s irate insistence that UFOs do not exist. (He’s all wet, but I love him nonetheless.)

Let’s get on it, huh? And quit dragging ourselves back to the flying saucer era where the titillation of ET craft usurped our thinking.

RR