For Dominick

 

I asked, at Facebook, if anyone knew of a UFO photograph taken from two different vantage points.

No response.

But the question, suggested or posed, by Dominick, in a comment here, is interesting, very much so.

I scoured Google for such a photograph: nada.

(I might try YouTube, although I somewhat hate that service.)

That there doesn't seem to be a photo or photos of a UFO (or even a UAP) taken from two offset vantage points goes to the heart of the mystery, doesn't it?

Multible witness sightings are always touted as UFO gold. Double-vantaged photographs -- even poor ones -- would be even more golden, I think, and Dominick's mentioning such as a proof-provider, intrigues me.

I'll keep at it. (What else have I got to do?)

RR

The Netflix UFO documentary says UFOs are here to stop nuclear war

https://www.moviemaker.com/top-secret-ufo-projects-declassified-netflix-are-aliens-trying-to-stop-nuclear-war/

UFOs are laser tech?

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/national-security/2021/august/investigative-reporter-explains-why-ufos-could-be-top-secret-laser-tech-designed-to-confuse-our-military

We are in a cognitive mess (and not just about UFOs)

Copyright 2021, InterAmerica, Inc.
 
The ongoing search for what UFOs are continues apace and is complicated nowadays by ideas that once were only in the back of Ufology thinkers’ minds: multiverse realities, parallel existences, simulated actions and processes, hidden species within the Earth’s geosphere, artificial intelligence properties or control, and a few others.
 
And the lesser minds of ufology have complicated the matter with insertions of mundane (even inane) categories such as UAP, a long-time-ago usage of flying skeptics who kept trying to water down any thought of solidity for flying saucers and UFOs. Donald Howard Menzel is an example.
 
Today, this thought mess is exacerbated by the failure of deep thinking by UFO newbies, members of the lower levels of societal existence, as demonstrated by the hordes of Trumpsters who represent the political (non)thinking extant in the United States and the anti-Macroners in France.
 
True ufologists don’t get immersed in politics or the vicissitudes of entertainment; they are absorbed in the UFO enigma, almost to an extent that is pathological, which is not meant as a slur by me.
 
My own UFO wallow is more than a fixation of a quirky mystery, just as it is more than a queer hobby for most of the regulars who visit this blog or flesh out a few Facebook UFO groups.
 
These people, like me (ahem!), are not dopes or persons with nothing better to do. They are seekers of a “profound” cipher, one that holds the clue (or full exegesis) of our existential (in the current misuse of that word) reality.
 
Holding back UFO skeptics, where ignorance abounds and is disguised by false and fake interrogations and pronouncements, is unnecessary. We true UFOers should sensibly ignore skeptics (and debunkers).
 
The UFO reality is so palpable that cognition of them should be blatant, unless one is blind or just plain mad (insane).
 
RR