The deep pathology of ancient astronaut theorists
Copyright 2022, InterAmerica, Inc.
The History Channel’s super
CGI Friday series is inter- esting, until the participants become ensnared in
their deep-rooted, self-induced pathology: obsessive belief in UFOs as extraterrestrial craft.
Friday’s [9/16] programming was deliciously filled with (idiotic) ruminations about Egyptian gods and a following program about the different kinds/shapes of UFOs allegedly seen over the years.
But the boys alter truths about those sightings with simply errant asides.
Friday’s [9/16] programming was deliciously filled with (idiotic) ruminations about Egyptian gods and a following program about the different kinds/shapes of UFOs allegedly seen over the years.
But the boys alter truths about those sightings with simply errant asides.
Forgetting the opening salvo about the 16th Century Nuremberg/ Basel Germany broadsheets indicating, wrongly, the idea that the pictures in those papers depicted UFO battles between alien visitors – the papers actually offering artistic depictions of the Reformist struggles between the Catholic Church and the newly created Protestant sect of Martin Luther – viewers were also slugged by AA regular Dave Childress reporting that Ken Arnold created the term “flying saucer” by saying, during an interview that what he saw “looked like a saucer.”
Everyone in ufology knows that Arnold, citing the motion of the crafts he saw in 1947 flew in a way that looked like a saucer being skipped on water – the comment being transfigured by a reporter who coined the term “flying saucer” in his newspaper account.
This is a typical example of how the AA theorists besmirch their ET suggestion for UFOs and other anomalies; they carve their ancient astronaut premise for UFOs in subtle ways, mostly by subverting the truth with almost tiny shifts in what they are talking about, shifts that color the narrative.
The process isn’t conjectural or speculative but suborned by the voice-over stating the AA boys are stating a truth with a resounding “yes.”
The problem lies in the pathological belief that extraterrestrial beings (aliens) are all over the place and have been since time immemorial: an astrophysical foolishness that indicates a warped mental malady.
Some of the AA copy in the History programming is at the edge of interesting possible UFO explanations but is undercut by the pathological need of the presenters, and they are, indeed, pathological. Not to understand that is the failure of the viewers' knowledge of mental waywardness, and procedures of logic and right-thinking.
Why the Ancient Astronaut disciples continue to exist, even with the patina of moronic thinking, resides in the calculating misconstructed presentations of thinking, supported by egregious tools of CGI showmanship.
The process is said by some to be sociopathic, but I see it as something pathological, more of a warped mentality than immoral behavior: these guys actually believe what they are saying.
That’s sad, but some viewers seeing their disjointed presentations as truths of a profound kind is even sadder.
RR

