Where do UFOs come from (1967) -- the old argumemts still in use by some readers here

https://youtu.be/xuaI9LaR5m4 

A video for those who think Physics (and math) are sacrosanct

 https://youtu.be/Lt53H9cXey4 

My pal Chris Savia, over at The Anomalist, provided these links today [8/28] which fit with our Mum ET discussion

Researchers Untangle "Arrow Of Time" Mystery In Groundbreaking New Physics Study The Debrief  We are all in the sights of the arrow of time, inexorably moving forward, but what impels it? Christopher Lynn, a postdoctoral fellow in the ITS program, has broken down the arrow of time to its constituent parts to reveal astonishing complexity writes Micah Hanks. This data raises more questions about our perception of time, reality, and physics. Speaking of which, a Discovery Challenges Pillar Of Modern Physics with CERN potentially detecting subatomic particles moving faster than the speed of light. Hopefully it's not a technical glitch like those neutrinos back in 2011, but Ron Synovitz reports researchers are working to independently verify this groundbreaking observation. In light of such discoveries, one can wonder Can Science Ever Discover The Absolute Truth About Reality? Ethan Siegel gets his hands dirty with the philosophical question of absolute truths vs. scientific truths, pointing out how it's important to still shoot for the moon even if we wind up in New Jersey. (CS)

Google's UFO newsfeed today [8/28] provided this

https://www.tampafp.com/ufos-on-camera-and-up-close-third-in-series/ 

Those mum extraterrestrials….

Copyright 2022, InterAmerica, Inc.

Isn't it strange that extraterrestrials who have, allegedly visited Earth for thousands of years, maybe longer, have never com- municated anything scientific-like, such as where they are located in the cosmos, providing distance (in our distance lexicon, light years) or their's.

 
When Carl Sagan and I.S.Shklovskii proposed, in Intelligent Life in the Universe [Chapter 33, Page 448 ff. PB] that (about) 10,000 years ago, alien visitors from the cosmos may have dropped in on Earth, the idea was astounding but based on circumstantial evidence, supplied significantly.
 
We know that in the time frame (10,000 years ago), the Ice Age had ended pretty much and humans lived in what we call The Stone Age, where man created primitive stone tools and estab- lished societal colonies at the intersection of stone and metal working.
 
So alien beings would have no compunction to communicate physical laws or scientific facts to homo sapiens who were at the threshold of abstract and definitive thought.
 
The peoples that Sagan/Shklovskii write about are the mysterious Sumerians in the period of 4000 B.C. and thereafter who provide indications of inter-galactic contact, although cave paintings and petroglyphs from much earlier suggest extraterrestrial contact.
 
But without the awareness endemic to mankind, before the Bronze Age, there could be no suggestion of communicated scientific knowledge forthcoming from cosmic visitors.
 
Thus, any overt communication of where extraterrestrial visitors came from, or how and why, would have to wait for a period when Greek, Egyptian, Indus societies (and others) might be able to apprehend what strange visitors (from the skies) were telling them or trying to.
 
But even then, no information was forthcoming, insofar as we can tell from written and oral records (myths) or “artistic” represen- tations. “Science” was not visible or palpable.
 
Moreover, there were no “presentations” of a scientific nature during and immediately after the Renaissance or even the so-called Enlightenment era.
 
And more significantly, in the modern era – 1947 and afterwards – the alleged contacts by alien beings [ETs], as enumerated by UFO researchers Rosales, Dennett, and Caravaca et al., there is next to nothing of a scientific or Physics (astronomical, cosmological) nature imparted by so-called visitors from Outer Space.
 
The encounters, reported in detail by some (addled) persons, are remiss in technical terms, which may have something to do with the inherent nature of the unsophisticated persons alleging the encounters, but more likely by the lack of such detail by those beings supposedly creating the encounter. (José Caravaca’s Dis- tortion Theory offers an explanation as to why that is.)
 
So-called and inherently imagined “telepathic” communications by other-world species and even overt “conversations” by and from alleged extraterrestrial species is completely devoid of any hard-cored information that explains or delineates the biographical reality of those making contact.
 
(The Betty/Barney Hill abduction scenario comes close to a confessional aria by the beings Betty Hill was supposedly accosted by, but even that was obscure.)

Nope – as the Peele movie has it – alien visitors to Earth and its species – all of flora and fauna – is not deemed worthy of an intelligent disclosure by the visitors of what they are, from where or why.
 
(Yes, I understand that some of you belie e that ET visitors are akin to human reactions confronting an ant colony or so-called diminished species here on Earth. But humans do have intelligent cachet of some kind, limited as it may be, to an outer-space race. So, that explanation of the confrontational lack suffers.)

This for me disallows – along with the distance, time, value elements – space visitors coming here, in droves as the recent upsurge in appearances seem to decry.
 
Give me your counter arguments, if you have any.
 
RR