George Knapp & Jeremy Corbell REVEAL Classified UFO Image

https://youtu.be/V5fJ-QldwRg?si=driCxl01n5jRd6jH

Vetted's Patrick, who just wants to be liked and not offend anyone, presented an alleged new video showing by Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp of their JellyFish video that has caused quite a stir recently.

The untrustworthy twosome -- Knapp and Corbell -- said that the video they are displaying is the JellyFish entering and leaving the water -- something they didn't show in the original video, causing hoots of laughs and contention that the original was a video of balloons, and the water entering and departure a canard.

To prove otherwise, the two fellows have come up with this video, which is of a different UAP although they say it's just a different camera view of the original, with a different color and configuration apparently.

And it doesn't show the image (or UAP) descending into water and rising from it, 18 minutes later.

These guys are really con-men who should be expelled from news media attention and deleted from any UFO/UAP conglomeration.

Corbell is shameless in his con and Knapp is no journalist, just a guy hoping to make a mark before he kicks the bucket.

That Vetted Patrick soft-pedals such drivel is pathetic. No wonder he hems and haws with his halting narration. He knows he's playing the fool or I hope he does, otherwise his life and efforts are a joke.

RR

No one ever remembers the interviewer…..

Copyright 2024, InterAmerica, Inc.

We recall Eisenhower’s comments about the “military, industrial complex” but who provoked the response?
 
And when Ken Arnold said his sighted objects flew like what one would see if they “skipped a saucer across the water.” Who got that rejoinder?
 
And when Betty Hill told listeners that her alien visitors put a needle in her navel, who got her to relate that detail?
 
And who got Hynek to stick his neck out with his “swamp gas” explanation?
 
And when David Grusch offered that the government has recovered non-biologic bodies from UAP debris, who instigated that whistle-blowing gem?
 
We don’t know and we don’t care who asks the questions or forces a response – whether it’s Rich Dolan, Joe Rogan, the Vetting’s Patrick, or even my pal Jesse Michels.
 
The askers are falling all over themselves to interview UFO/UAP notables, and their efforts often affect a reply that is jarring or important, but while we remember, vividly, those replies or res- ponses, the person who stimulated the effect is never a memory in our mind or is identified in any record of that response no matter how jarring, significant, or stimulating it is or was.
 
So, let the podcasters, reporters, TV hosts, and questioners do their thing, as they say, and allow us to move on to the meat of the matter, as our guy Dominick suggests and I, stupidly, neglect to follow that advice.
 
RR

YouTube merde and another scourge attacking the internet

 

YouTube like other social media sites contains a passel of shit that passes, or tries to, as edifying. Most isn't. But you know that.

Like Facebook, X, TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, et al., good input is offset by flimsy, often untrue, or deleterious material.

And as a repository for many podcasts now extant, the clutter is offputting, even sickening.

Like the image above, hosts are grubby or eccentric, often des- perate for water -- thirst seems epidemic -- and while the self-glorification is ripe, even subtle occasionally, it is there, in spades -- the point being to accrue guests before or longer at the mic than their fellow podcasters.

What one can cull from the Alphabet system is more tawdry than beneficial but yet there are scads of food materials, films, and info that is priceless. However one has to go on a scavenger hunt to find it.

That's what I try to do here, although I admit to inputting, lately, lots of scrub matter and apologize for doing so.

My point here is to insert that we are at a time when flotsam is floating, abundantly, in the UFO seas and garbage abounds.

And a new scourge has surfaced: Wikipedia is now under attack, more massively than in the past, by a group Guerilla Skeptics of Wikipedia who rework material in the Wikipedia pages.

The reworking consists of bogus corrections and inserts:

https://youtu.be/rUCBZcBY_5M?si=gERqAaTqLAvYCMxI

Adding this malconceived effort to the flaccid YouTube detritus makes for obtaining truths beyond difficult. It makes it almost impossible, maybe impossible altogether.

This is a heads-up you should be aware of, of course, and some- thing to conjure with.

RR

Garry Nolan DENIES Part Of Diana Pasulka’s UFO Story

https://youtu.be/GESuMSL5oNI?si=AgJu_EXkYlkS7fIf

N.B. Another nail in the pending coffin of Diana Pasulka?

The February 10th YouTube madness within the UFO/UAP arena

Neil Armstrong Breaks Down in Tears: The Moon Is Not What You Think

https://youtu.be/JLhqOkjktqo?si=3EUVs5fXEYMp_6D0

Chris Lehto is live!

https://www.youtube.com/live/lNDFknHcRrE?si=AZUeOd27wYBku7Yr

Then This:

The Neil Armstrong video is a conglomeration of mad "reportage."

Chris Lehto's LIVE video showcases Chris playing guitar at a rather empty bar or restaurant. Sad...

The Pasulka interview -- her name is now Diana Heath? (Did she divorce?) And is she an Atheist?

Each item, showcased on YouTube 2/10, is an example of the madness encountered at that Service: No vetting of videos. No peer reviews of materials presented. And  egregious promotion of videos.

Armstrong is libeled? Lehto seeks any kind of attention. And Pasulka provokes a possibility of losing her University gig -- tenured or not -- and excommunication if she is the Catholic I think her to be.

This is the current UFO/UAP arena. It is a virtual lunatic asylum. To let it pass, unnoted, is its own madness.

RR