Enough, already!

Copyright 2024, InterAmerica, Inc.

Okay, those reading this know (and have known) that UFOs are, in fact, signs of a concrete and real phenomenon.
 
What the essence of that reality is remains open to discussion but it appears that UFOs are visitations from outside our particular status of existence, on this planet.
 
Time-travelers? Inter-dimensional intruders? Parallel universe interlopers? Extra-terrestrial visitors? What, exactly?
 
That’s the rub….
 
We are surfeited by speculation and/or determinant specificity by persons who say they are in the know, but are they?
 
The point is that UFOs are here and a kind of vanguard of some sort, good or bad? We don’t know.
 
But those buggers who keep us anxiety ridden by either proclaim- ing various scenarios: UFOs are malevolent. UFOs are demonic. UFOs are bringers of peace. UFOs are a danger to humanity. And so on.
 
We are not going to get a “disclosure” from those who know some- thing. And the UFO muckrakers are just causing a stir to keep their coffers filled with a few dollars from whatever gullible sources who provide cover and dough even when the cons are obvious: Corbell, Knapp, Strieber, deviant podcasters, book publishers and writers who jot down material that is irrelevant but sustenance for those enamored of anything UFO (and now UAP) related.
 
It’s time for the rest of us – the unconned, the long-timers who have been patient with the enigma, and the sincerely curious – to place the shysters on the back burners and find a way, outside the normal way of doing things, to determine what UFOs really are.
 
And those who think we are incapable of discerning such a mystery, get out of the way and let brilliant activity and thought prevail, unencumbered by the constant inserts of the slimy, ignorant and conniving members of the UFO circle: the DeLonges, the Stein- bergs, the Ancient Alien apostles, the filmmakers who prevaricate, the TV broadcasters exploiting the stupidity of the great unwashed, and the social media dolts hoping for likes more than the truth of things.
 
Speak out. Disclosure is a fiction. Get with a program of intensive pursuit to unmask the great phenomenon of our generation.
 
Enough of the madness.

RR

Former UFO Study Official Confirms Info Found in Anthony Bragalia's FOIA Related to UFO Debris

About 10 weeks ago James Lacatski privately published a book which confirms much of Anthony Bragalia’s FOIA to the Defense Intelligence Agency requesting technical information on UFO/UAP debris analysis conducted by Bigelow Aerospace. The DIA, after more than three years, provided to him 151 pages technical data on “metamaterials” and “amorphous materials” that have the ability to create invisibility, change the speed of light, recover shape when deformed (memory metal) and that can compress energy.  

Lacatski, who was the former Program Manager for the Defense Intelligence Agency’s AAWSAP (Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program) which inspired AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program) was the one who signed off on the reports received. The DIA had redacted his name, but it is now known that he was the reviewer/approver of the study reports.

 

Lacatski confirms in his new book “Inside the US Government Covert UFO Program: Initial Revelations” that:

 

-AATIP/AAWSAP related to deep technical UAP study under the guise of aerospace research and development.

 

-Bigelow Aerospace was a prime contractor to the DIA in doing these studies. Lacatski dedicates the book to Robert Bigelow and to the late Senator Harry Reid, who helped fund $22 million for the studies.

 

-Lacatski is personally aware of recovered alien craft. He describes one thusly: “The United States is in possession of a craft of unknown origin and has successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared to have no engine, fuel tanks, or fuel.” He continues, “What is the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft used only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate? Lacastski goes no further in his statement on this but does indicate that this book is part of a planned series. Perhaps he will offer more details in the future.

 

-Some of the DIA study group documents that Lacatski oversaw he decided to release as “DIRDs” or “Defense Intelligence Reference Documents.” Written for AAWSAP/AATIP, they related to topics such as UAP power generation and to the materials of construction, as well as other topics. These DIRDs were released for others to explore potential commercial and scientific applications, with their actual impetus from UAP study, a fact obscured in their release.

 

-“Technical Studies Part 6” of the overall study relates specifically to “Materials” -presumably of the the type addressed in the documents that I received in response to my FOIA request.

 

-Lacatski takes Pentagon Spokesperson Sue Gough to task for her promotion of “blandness and lack of detail.”

 

“Black Vault” FOIA repository founder John Greenewald and UFO researcher Kevin Randle publicly castigated Anthony Bragalia for what they saw as his erroneous interpretation of the FOIA reply that he received. Now with Lacatski’s new release, it is clear that the FOIA did in fact relate to UFO debris technical study and not to aerospace research as Randle and Greenewald had maintained.

Google UFO Alerts for 2/17 continues its inordinate list of UFO "hotspots" (ignored by me) but here's a thing on our supposed Simulation

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/new-ufo-documentary-explores-simulation-theory-is-life-a-computer-game-controlled-by-aliens-1033076535

The Why Files Doesn’t Trust David Grusch?

 https://youtu.be/ZgViNRtQJtQ?si=bvZNR1S4BX_Uvoz3

This is for Ron (who likes the Why Files I think) and also for the Anti-Grusch people like Tony and Paul.