[UFO] Research
Copyright 2020, InterAmerica, Inc.
A while back I mentioned that I was reading a book I got
from the University of Chicago, The Craft of Research, Edited by Booth,
Colomb, Williams, Bizup, and Fitzgerald [Fourth Edition, 2016]
(Terry the Censor asked if I might put some of the content
online, which I did, a few times, but I never heard whether he saw it or not.)
Looking at the book again, I grabbed a (highlighted by me)
Page 57 which as you can see tells readers the difference between “Pure” and
‘Applied” Research. (Mouse over image to enlarge.):
On page 58 is this summary of the above:
“The problem calls for applied research because only when
astro- nomers know how to account for atmospheric distortion can they do
what they want to – measure light more accurately.”
Do UFO “researchers” use “pure” or “applied” research when
they work with a UFO sighting, report, or speculation?
Does anyone reading this?
The word “research” and the activity of “research” are much
different in science and academia than in ufology, that’s certain.
And discriminating between real research and bogus research
is a must if one really wants to get at the truth of the UFO phenom- enon.
(I’ll have more from the book, just in case Terry the Censor
shows up, a sporadic thing for him.)
RR


