Those non-UAP “events”

Copyright 2021, InterAmerica, Inc,
 
Our guy Martin noted in a comment under the AA spacecraft piece below this one that no one seems to be working with or on UFO encounters, as Ron, Daniel, and I also see it.

There was a  note on FB about the lack of recordings or evidence during or about so-called alien abductions, just the lack of evidence, no discussion or support, even from believers in abductions or skeptics.
 
CE3 and CE4 encounters and other queer contacts have been set aside pretty much by the UFO community for Luis Elizondo’s exposed DoD videos or peripheral odd events that have little or nothing to do with UFOs per se.

Those UFO episodes in which odd creatures are confronted or confronting humans, as in the Pascagoula incident, have remained troublesome for UFOers.
 
Do the events represent aspects of the paranormal, generally or ET intrusions as some would like, or are the episodes delusional, psychological or neurological in nature, biologic or mental malfeasances of several kinds?
 
Martin’s comment tells us that UFO enthusiasts are lost in the commonality of interest in the, perhaps, definable images that smother the UFO topic today.

I’d like to know what those smudged blips depict and maybe defining the images will resolve the encounter queries, but I’m not so sure.
 
We seem to have several categories of UAP or UFOs: (those boring) orbs, strange lights (Hessdalen), maneuvering blips, maybe craft, crashed disks, flying triangles, et al.

It’s a menu of obtuse, truly odd things in the sky, or sea, and sometimes with entities on the ground or in bedrooms.
 
The panoply of weird things keeps UFO groups vibrant and Nick Redfern prolific with his journalistic approach to such items, and it keeps some of here, off-kilter, as we wait for some kind of denouement.
 
RR