UFOs and U.S. Nukes
Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.
The two Google Alerts about UFOs and nuclear warheads
(linked in the posting before this one) goes to the heart of a matter, one of
them, about the enigmatic phenomenon.
Robert Hastings and our pal Tim Hebert are experts about UFO apparent interruptions with nuclear facilities and missiles/warheads that adorn the U.S. protective agencies in case of a nuclear attack by this country’s enemies (China, Russia, and North Korea mainly).
What does this tell us about UFOs?
They are protective preventers of a possible nuclear war and what that portends for Earth’s humanity and planet?
Commoners in the UFO community have often insisted that UFOs (and some imagined UFO entities) were spooked by atomic testings in the 1940s and scooted to Earth to see what was going on.
Even though an atomic blast would not register in interstellar space, except with a super sensitive technology gauged for such testings – a possibility but not a probability as an atomic fissionable explosion is a minor event within the context of space happenings.
Now, if UFOs are from our future that might explain the attention that nuclear weapons would get from visitors.
Or if UFOs are crypto-terrestrial vehicles from somewhere on (or in) Earth – as Mac Tonnies suggested in his literary output – one could understand the UFO attentiveness.
But if, as most readers here believe, UFOs are alien spaceships, what would their concern be, since the objects’ scrutiny over millennia has been accompanied by a hands-off policy, some dolts using the fictional Star Trek storyline about the “Prime Directive” to explain such a lackadaisical behavior.
Is it possible, as I’ve often suggested, that the mechanism(s) of moving UFOs around merely [sic] interfere with the technology involved with nuclear weaponry?
Or are UFOs AI components trying to connect with Earth's fellow AI mechanisms “they” see as brothers or sisters?
The matter is open to conjecture, despite the insistence that many nuclear aficionados believe is the reason for UFO attention to our nuclear weaponry: a signal of pending preventative measures if we ever decide to use them in warfare.
What’s your take, my silent (thoughtful?) readers?
RR
Robert Hastings and our pal Tim Hebert are experts about UFO apparent interruptions with nuclear facilities and missiles/warheads that adorn the U.S. protective agencies in case of a nuclear attack by this country’s enemies (China, Russia, and North Korea mainly).
What does this tell us about UFOs?
They are protective preventers of a possible nuclear war and what that portends for Earth’s humanity and planet?
Commoners in the UFO community have often insisted that UFOs (and some imagined UFO entities) were spooked by atomic testings in the 1940s and scooted to Earth to see what was going on.
Even though an atomic blast would not register in interstellar space, except with a super sensitive technology gauged for such testings – a possibility but not a probability as an atomic fissionable explosion is a minor event within the context of space happenings.
Now, if UFOs are from our future that might explain the attention that nuclear weapons would get from visitors.
Or if UFOs are crypto-terrestrial vehicles from somewhere on (or in) Earth – as Mac Tonnies suggested in his literary output – one could understand the UFO attentiveness.
But if, as most readers here believe, UFOs are alien spaceships, what would their concern be, since the objects’ scrutiny over millennia has been accompanied by a hands-off policy, some dolts using the fictional Star Trek storyline about the “Prime Directive” to explain such a lackadaisical behavior.
Is it possible, as I’ve often suggested, that the mechanism(s) of moving UFOs around merely [sic] interfere with the technology involved with nuclear weaponry?
Or are UFOs AI components trying to connect with Earth's fellow AI mechanisms “they” see as brothers or sisters?
The matter is open to conjecture, despite the insistence that many nuclear aficionados believe is the reason for UFO attention to our nuclear weaponry: a signal of pending preventative measures if we ever decide to use them in warfare.
What’s your take, my silent (thoughtful?) readers?
RR
