Old-fashioned UFOs: A follow-up to previous Non-ET UFO piece

Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.

While reading the current [2017] issue of WIRED magazine, I notice that items and artifacts of our present human existence are more futuristic than the alleged artifacts and elements said to be seen by witnesses in their UFO sightings.

I know this has been broached before -- the archaic, old-fashioned Airship constructs, for instance -- but it become obvious that UFOs, as "sighted" or experienced, are short of what one would expect from and advanced space traveling race.

In the WIRED magazine, at hand, is a story about Apple's new headquarters in Cupertino City, California; the article sub-titled, interestingly, on the magazine's cover: "Inside Apple's Insanely Great [or just insane] New Mothership," the designation coming from the HQ's architectural design as you can see in the cover picture here.

But it's not that alone that puts the UFO "reality" in perspective. When you gather together all the factoids and detritus from UFO witness testimony, whether from Ezekiel or Betty Hill or Stephan Michalak, you should note how primitive the crafts are.

And the witness testimony is supported by what few flying saucer or UFO photos we have that might be authentic.

The 1896 Airship craze in America, mostly California, is fraught with ships barely flying they are so beleaguered by their heft and construction.

And flying saucers depicted right up to today, some supposedly seen up close, as in the Travis Walton episode or the Robert Taylor scuffle -- an AI thing as I see it -- are not anywhere as near advanced as one might expect from a space-faring species.

Adamski's chicken-brooder contraption typified the flying saucers (UFOs) purportedly spotted by "real" witnesses long after Adamski foundered and disappeared.

We see advanced objects all around us -- iPhones, laptop computers, driverless cars, even aircraft -- that put UFOs to shame, constructively and futuristic in nature.

If UFOs were actually spacecraft from an advanced species, they wouldn't crash, as the Roswell incident has it, nor would they look so ramshackle and rudimentary as described by those who think they've seen one or interacted with one.

So, ET believers, give up your "fantasy" -- your delusion: UFOs may be something but they certainly are not extraterrestrial spacecraft from Planet 9.

RR

UFOs may be real, but not crafted by ETs, not at all!

Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.

If you scour the UFO canon, the UFO lore or literature, carefully and seriously, you can only conclude that UFOs may be real but there is nothing in that batch of folderol that would indicate UFOs are spacecraft from extraterrestrial worlds; nothing, not even anything circumstantial.

An encounter with “humanoids” – a favorite “UFO genre” of mine – presents either a glob of hallucinatory accounts or something bizarre in a way that has nothing to do with beings from outer space or alien civilizations from the cosmos.

There is nothing tangible or even tangentially close to showing something that might be construed as or indicative of an extraterrestrial civilization that has dropped by this Earth.

Each UFO encounter and every UFO sighting is mundane in every way even when the sightings or encounter is flush with extraordinary elements.

Not one UFO event – from Kenneth Arnold’s iconic sighting to the Betty/Barney Hill alleged kidnapping, Socorro, the 1976 Tehran supposed interaction, or the Phoenix lights, even the O’Hare airport observations, et cetera, et cetera – has anything that would hint at an ET intrusion.

Yes, I believe UFOs are a real phenomenon. What the essence of that phenomenon is eludes minds better than mine.

But if you have one UFO sighting where the details of it include something that only can be thought to be extraterrestrial, let me know.

We humans have no idea what an extraterrestrial civilization or ET visitors might consist of or how they would appear or act if encountered, but none would, if one uses common sense, present themselves as described by witness reports.

Flying fast and making 180 degree turns isn’t proof of extraterrestrial acumen.

Being oddly clothed (and they rarely are in witness accounts) says nothing about an alien dress code.

Speaking (or telepathing thoughts) isn’t a sign of an advanced alien culture. (It’s more like evidence of a schizophrenic bout by the witness.)

Disappearing in a whiff of smoke or just going invisible says nothing about an ET explanation. It’s strange, yes, but otherworldly? Nope.

The ET explanation is a group delusion of most ufologists and UFO buffs.

It’s not logical or based upon any forensic evidence that could only be considered extraterrestrial, if we had any idea what “extraterrestrial evidence” might be.

That every UFO sighting is hinted as being alien (extraterrestrial), even by news media, confounds the simplicity of sightings, which are queer surely, but not containing one iota of anything that could smack of an extraterrestrial presence, nothing!

RR