A UFO Event: Not an atypical UFO account
The bizarre 1979
Robert Taylor “UFO encounter” has shown up again in internet UFO discussions.
It’s been a favorite of mine, because it is bizarre,
and seemingly unique, yet it isn’t unique but a template for explaining other
UFO accounts.
Here’s the Wikipedia rendition of the tale:
And here is an explanation in that Wikipedia summary:
“Patricia Hannaford, founder of the Edinburgh University UFO
Research Society and a qualified physician advised Campbell on medical aspects
of the case. She suggested that Taylor's collapse was an isolated attack of
temporal lobe epilepsy, and the fit explained the objects as hallucinations.
Symptoms such as Taylor's previous meningitis, his report of a strong smell
which nobody else could detect, his headache, dry throat, paralysis of his legs
and period of unconsciousness suggested this cause.”
This explanation could apply to many of the ground level UFO
reports, and some abduction accounts: the Pascagoula and Travis Walton
encounters to name a few.
The problem is, and has always been, the lack of intensive
investigation by UFO “researchers” who often just study and recount UFO events
superficially, juxtaposed with a bias that is based in the ET hypothesis; that
is, flying saucers and UFOs derive from extraterrestrial visitation.
Now there are many UFO accounts that cannot and should not
be addressed by a neurological or psychological etiology.
But separating the wheat from the chaff, as it were, could
eliminate many UFO reports from the mysterious category, allowing a scrutiny of
the truly strange phenomenological sightings, something Blue Book or the Condon
study didn’t do and UFO investigators are not doing and never have.
If ufology is dead, and it is, a new approach and sobriquet should
surely take into account the ramifications of biology, psychology, neurology,
and other disciplines that have been ignored by the amateurs who’ve mucked up
most, if not all, UFO accounts in the literature, including that UFO albatross,
Roswell.
RR

