David Halperin, Bryan Sentes, and Whitley Strieber
Copyright 20222, InterAmerica, Inc.
That Two persons, holding forth as scholars – David Halperin and Bryan Sentes – are presenting encomiums about and for that grand-charlatan Whitley Strieber is more than disheartening, it’s a kind of academic blasphemy.
Both men presume to actuate truths, from scholarly thought, yet they tout a man and his writings that are flawed fiction and stated as such by cognoscenti
https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/9780472068968-34.pdf
To go further, would present more about Strieber than I or anyone interested in veracity should allow.
Let me conclude by writing that the attention and kudos offered by Halperin and Sentes about Strieber puts them in a category of foolishness that will keep them from these pages.
(I’ve deleted material posted for Bryan the past few days. His gullibility forced me to do so.)
RR
That Two persons, holding forth as scholars – David Halperin and Bryan Sentes – are presenting encomiums about and for that grand-charlatan Whitley Strieber is more than disheartening, it’s a kind of academic blasphemy.
Both men presume to actuate truths, from scholarly thought, yet they tout a man and his writings that are flawed fiction and stated as such by cognoscenti
https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/9780472068968-34.pdf
To go further, would present more about Strieber than I or anyone interested in veracity should allow.
Let me conclude by writing that the attention and kudos offered by Halperin and Sentes about Strieber puts them in a category of foolishness that will keep them from these pages.
(I’ve deleted material posted for Bryan the past few days. His gullibility forced me to do so.)
RR
