THE INDEFINITE ORIGIN OF ANOMALOUS APPARITIONS by Jose Caravaca
Copyright 2018, Jose Antonio Caravaca
Most researchers have not assessed the strange
coincidences between different phenomena, which seem to point clearly to a
common origin of them. It is very strange that all the entities that have been
described throughout history (daemons, fairies, angels, ghost,
extraterrestrials, etc.) have adequately received an explanation or
determination by researchers, describing their origin and true purpose of their
appearances before humans.
Little has been made clear from the researchers of
anomalies, about the nature of UFO crew members, ghosts, elves, and other
amazing creatures that have appeared in our wake.
Why is there this vagueness of meaning in these
manifestations? Why are they all elusive and confusing when it comes to
communicating any message? But, in obvious counterpoint, the apparitions are
very detailed in form and appearance, and they spare no effort in manifesting
themselves broadly and blatantly, with all kinds of accessories, clothes, tools,
gadgets.
However, when it comes to communicating, they are
tremendously sparing in words, and on many occasions they transmit false or
ridiculous information. It is very probable that these manifestations, as a
whole, obey a "psycho-dimensional" phenomenon that originates and is
based on the unconscious information provided by the witnesses in conjunction
with an external agent.
Thus, it seems that the entities being manifested cannot
communicate any interesting or outstanding information, since, ultimately,
these apparitions are mostly due to a psychic process in which the observers
play a predominant role, yet there seems to be something else at work.
And while the psyche of the witnesses acts as an
essential catalyst that facilitates access to the encounter with this
manifested unknown reality, it is not the only “actor” in the manifestation.
Polymath René Girard posited external and internal models
or mediators when he discussed human desires, external mediators existing
outside time or space and internal mediators that act within the social or
inner human sphere. [From NYRB, 12/20/18, Page 62]
So, similarly, is it possible that in The Distortion
Theory, there are two agents, internal and external, mediating what is being
“observed” by a witness, one providing external materials new to the witness
and one providing material from the (inner) psyche of the witness, material
unique to the witness?
Therefore, while we can’t ignore or underestimate the
function of the human psyche in the composition of these paradigms, we have to
concede that there may be an external manifestation that condemns us to wander
eternally through a labyrinth of unknowability.
JAC

