Brilliant minds, more brilliant UFOs

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.

The few outstanding UFO enthusiasts – those who really think – have always been stymied by the UFO phenomenon.
 
The topic has also been swamped with an ignorant batch, some still exuding influence on the great unwashed (the public generally).
 
The problem lies in the nature of the enigmatic odd intruders in our skies and seas.
 
Is there a way to get to the heart of the mystery by thinking into it? I don’t think so.
 
It seems that all human matters – no matter the category – are troubled by thought but much of the human drama has been delved into by thinkers and resolved to the good, except for some illnesses or diseases, cancer for example.
 
The UFO scenario remains outside human cognition, and while government agencies or military configurations may have insight into the phenomenon – because of technical scrutiny, even crashed or captured (shot down) UFOs – the enigma remains.
 
We who aren’t particularly brilliant should follow the thought of those who are brilliant or erudite when it comes to the phenom- enon and anything connected to it, but we shouldn’t become subservient to that outer brilliance or thinking.
 
It doesn’t compute, as they say.
 
The UFO field is, perhaps, an unresolvable mystery, one beholden to no one or nothing with which we can contend, by thought or human insight.
 
I’ll keep offering intriguing UFO accounts and happenings here (and elsewhere) but that’s for our entertainment mostly.
 
After all, the phenomenon outsmarts us all – even those who think they have a handle on the matter.
 
RR 

The proof is not in the photographic pudding when it comes to UFOs

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.
 
Some regulars here – Dominick for one – think that certain UFO photographs are authentic – the Billy Meier stuff or the Heflin photos.
 
But a bevy of Paul Villa photos showed up in a YouTube notification I got 1/26, the 1960s snapshots were hot back then but now reside in the hoax category even though the photos were created as skillfully at Meier’s or Heflin’s.

 

Background vetting of Villa (and Meier) indicated hoaxing. Heflin not so much, so we remain stumped by his series of snapshots.

What would have been his point in creating the series? He didn’t really capitalize on them.
 
And they remain open to inquiry, still, in 2023.
 
But do they tell us anything about UFOs, except that they are enigmatic?
 
Photos, alone, of UFOs get us nowhere.
 
That’s how it is and how it’ll remain, until a bona vide, examination of a UFO itself, in situ, is made by someone totally credible in the public sector.
 
But don’t hold your breath…
 
RR