The UFO old-guard is in a quiet panic!

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.

 

Interacting with UFO geezers – the old UFO [UAP challenged] hobbyists – indicates that they – those oldsters – are disturbed about the Grusch/Graves/Gaetz inferences making news.
 
All the verbose or written ruminations the old UFO crowd has piled up and on which they’ve rested their long-time efforts are now as straw in the wind.
 
It’s as if Jesus has finally come back, fulfilling his Second Coming promise, leaving those steeped in religious fervor and anticipation with nothing more to hope for.
 
The gathering (and archiving) of old UFO accounts and reports along with the futile “data” accumulation by old-men frat groups – SCU – or non-result laden expeditions like that Avi Loeb foolishness are now seen – in light of the UFO Hearing revelations – as meaningless, absolute non-relevant effluvia.
 
This has nothing to do with the UFO Hearing revelations being credible or true. Those accounts of the Hearing witnesses open the door to possibilities that appear real by virtue of the Pentagon’s responses – or, rather, non-responses.
 
That some of the smart guys in this blog gang are vibrantly anti-Grusch is symptomatic of that very distaste of the old crowd: the idea that their positions are about to become actual e.g.; UFOs have been gathered, in some way, and technically examined along with non-human entities in the mix, as has been the underlying “truth” of Roswell since 1978, when Stan Friedman got Jesse Martell to indicate what David Grusch is saying now is the UFO reality.
 
I have placed online here and elsewhere material (videos, accounts, books, reports) that underwrite and support David Grusch’s whistle-blowing statements, and the one-time belief of the new skeptics, pals of mine.
 
Yes, the itemization of many “crashed” or disabled UFOs is troubling. (How could alleged advanced non-humans be so inept?)
 
But there it is. UFOs are the harbingers of things that are and to be.
 
To remain clogged by the stupidities of the past and the dolts who persist in maintaining that pathetic status quo is not my cup o’ tea nor that of some few here, who understand what is at stake and about to rival reality, UFO and human both, in a profound way.
 
RR

The DeBrief: Micah Hanks on the Hearing

https://thedebrief.org/the-congressional-hearing-on-uap-what-we-learned-from-yesterdays-testimony/

Kilroy was here

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.

Dominick, Ron, me, and even Martin Black and Paul Kimball care little if we leave a mark in the UFO soil.
 
Dominick, Ron, and me are just a couple of guys long intrigued by the UFO (flying saucer) enigma. We’d like to end that itch once and for all.
 
Martin Black has other fish to fry. Paul Kimball could not care less about UFOs. (Paul lives a quaint pleasurable life in Canada, a life filled with daily human pleasures.)
 
Tony Bragalia would like, I think, to be the guy who solves the Roswell incident, something Kevin Randle once was inclined toward also.
 
José Caravaca wants, I believe, to have a slice of the influence that Jacques Vallee has.
 
A lot of my UFO friends at Facebook (or Twitter and Reddit) want to make a UFO splash but don’t really, down deep, care if they do or don’t; they’re just treading water.
 
The UFO creeps – Corbell. (failed TV anchor) Knapp, Greer, Basset, Dolan, et al. – can be and are dismissed by real news media persons and authentic UFO enthusiasts. They really don’t count.
 
The Ancient Alien crowd and personalities are too borderline to matter and when the real truth of what UFOs are and what they mean, that gang will evaporate faster than an ice cream cone in the current summer heat.
 
Already some long-time UFO losers – like Philip Mantle and a few others who I like and won’t name here – are already defunct.
 
The raft of just below water UFO hobbyists – some visiting here now and then – really don’t matter. They live lives of quiet desperation, as we used to say, and matter little to nothing in the UFO scheme of things.

Note Bill Murphy's links to UFO commentary 7/27 (on the Anomalist site) of a slew of names writing about the 7/26 UFO Hearing. Do any of those people cited and their observations matter? Do they?
 
(In my media role, I’ve been, at Facebook’s urging, offering memories of my past writings about local media folks. And it’s surprising how little those people and my remarks remain significant. They’ve moved on, most to memorable perdition and my past commentary a whim of ego, meaning nothing really.)
 
I’ve noted here that magazine and news items often regurgitate the one-time glories of past actors, musicians, artists, philosophers, scientists, news-makers of many ilks, all to no real avail or importance, when one thinks on it.
 
I’m sure Billy Cox, in his current medical condition, considers his written rampages as whimsy, denoting little to nothing worth anything when it comes down to it.

Chris Lehto and John Greenewald Jr. plus all those un-notable podcasters who pop up daily lately are into the UFO matter, not for money, but a modicum of fame or attention.
 
When push comes to shove, after the UAP denouement, their purpose for living will evaporate, while Paul Kimball, and Dominick, Ron, and me will go on with our lives, devoid of the UFO mystery, allowing us to be happy with the comforts of life that ease us to the final episode.
 
RR

Guilt by association?

Copyright 2023, InterAmerica, Inc.

My pals, Bragalia and Kimball, even Martin Black do not like David Grusch; they think he's a phony or, as in Tony's opinion, an autistic compromised person.

Since those UFO leeches, Corbell, Knapp, Greer, et al., swarmed Grusch, as his story took hold, my buds have thrust Grusch into the same filthy basket of leechism as those named and others.

The UFO boobs are like bears to honey: they seek out persons with a UFO story, not to get at any truth, but to gather some of that person's spotlight.

(This kind of thing happened in the 50s when my idol Joe McCarthy lumped persons into the Communist camp if they ever had a moment or coffee with some alleged member of the Party.)

I think, as you know, that Grusch's stories, hearsay as they mostly are, do represent the reality as it is with the U.S. military, the Pentagon: the military has had, by whatever means, access to the UFO reality -- debris, film, photos, radar readings and other tech data -- and have tried to back-engineer what "objects" they have got hold of.

That is, Grusch has the dope -- made up or whatever -- and we UFO long-timers know it. 

To demean Grusch is to kill the goose with the golden egg -- access to news media and persons who can dredge the truth from the military or, at least, give that military a kick in its secretive ass.

So, while I continue to provide contrary views of David Grusch, I continue to accept his information, fairy tale or actual.

It's my view, and that of the opposers, which they refuse to admit.

RR

Billy Cox on the UFO Hearing

ttps://lifeinjonestown.substack.com/p/one-hell-of-a-moment