!00+ "things" swarmed a Navy ship, and they weren't drones?

https://www.tmz.com/2022/06/27/ufo-navy-swarm-not-drones-expert-jeremy-corbell-pushes-back/

I'm not a Jeremy Corbell fan, for no particular reason except he seems to be a sensationalist, but others find him to be a credible UFO source.

Yet, even the idea that 100 UFOs -- not UAP -- things with material solidity or ethereal substance were surveilling  Navy ships is hard to explain (or believe) but apparently witnesses confirm the sightings.

However, Corbell saying this raises my concern for his opinion(s): "...the unknown objects showed otherworldly capability and definitely weren't drones." [Italics mine]

What is "otherworldly capability"? Who knows what "otherworldly capability" might be? No one has ever seen or experienced or can know what otherworldly anything is. 

The presumption -- that someone knows what "otherworldly capability" is or might be -- is hubris of a dotty kind.

One of our regulars here also thinks that the AATIP videos indicate activity of an interstellar kind, maneuvers and technology of an advanced species from off Earth.

The 100+ thingies spotted by credible and skilled witnesses deserve scrutiny certainly, but jumping to a conclusion that the spotted things were "otherworldly" goes far beyond common or speculative sense.

And that's what we're dealing with in UFO circles and journalistic media. Presumptive nonsense.

RR