Hey, pals ....
If you don't have access to the UFO/UAP blog and want access, contact me via Facebook (Messenger or directly), Instagram, X, or g-mail, even yahoo
RR
If you don't have access to the UFO/UAP blog and want access, contact me via Facebook (Messenger or directly), Instagram, X, or g-mail, even yahoo
RR
https://youtu.be/jLal2F8ZhAA?si=5FsgxsRh5kOvjK0P
Lights and orbs do not fascinate me, as you know, but the images in this video are interesting,
What the night-sky images portend is open to speculation, of course. So what might yours be?
RR
https://youtu.be/tHv-6-xyQIg?si=gfbB7G6_9LwrHsXq
Ryan Wood, in his Preface and Introduction to this book -- $14.95 via Amazon -- writes that we Ufologists have got to "disclose" what we can muster from a new enterprise UFOdex -- an AI and "search" database accessible at UFOdex.com where a massive site of UFO materials exists.
That is, we have to bypass the government/military cover-up and secrecy and provide what we have to the public -- our own "disclosure"!
I am, as you know, in full agreement and have shifted this blog and others away from those who can't or won't comply, instead waiting for a government disclosure -- something Wood says is naive.
I'll be using UFOdex and shall also present some of what Mr. Wood has already provided in this book about his efforts.
I'll need input from those I've "invited" to participate here -- Ron Press has been stalwart in his offerings -- and if nothing is forthcoming from others, I'll remove them from the readership here.
Ufology is a group effort, not a one-guy thrust to get at the explanation of what UFOs (or UAP) are.
RR
https://youtu.be/2J_ULgpueRY?si=z0-elUoRsI0866RI
Why am I relinking a 1989 Russian encounter I've placed on here before?https://youtu.be/xIULwEwcCnM?si=h-wHrRPUdXETTzfs
Again, Casper vibrates with excitement about lights and blurs that are captured badly by phone cameras.https://youtu.be/n0XGuXrWYMo?si=QDJJ9ww5a2OG5_Yn
121,791 views
Apr 15, 2024 #aliens #paranormal
Casper gets overly excited about things that UFO long-timers have dismissed long ago. This "confession" is one.
Boyd Bushman has been parlaying his story and photographs for many years now and I don't know anyone or any venue that has given his tale and information any credence.
It's an enticing amateur presentation and could be true, if one accepts an old guy giving up the goods he's held (and promoted) for such a long period of time.
Who would do such a thing? Aren't old guys, nearer to death's door than almost everyone else, supposed to tell the truth as they near their final days on Earth?
RR
https://youtu.be/8TdbqAj5qZ8?si=x27NFdn1fdy1fzAR
Along with bromides, in this video, from Sagan, Clarke, Fermi, et al., the idea that advanced ETs would (or might) examine this planet as a kind of zoo, exacerbates my patience.https://youtu.be/zvLGxqrATIU?si=pq8AscuMQ75VhRj5
https://youtu.be/QwSRl2dbYQI?si=ptVqpDAlaq22nTdT
https://youtu.be/hLgwM1-JTBk?si=kNypuW9YHTNATMN-
Copyright 2024, AI-America
Reddit sets itself up as an IPO:
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2024/03/20/reddit-nears-ipo-heres-what-investors-need-to-know.html
What does that have to do with UFOs (or UAP even) or AI or "cli- mate change" and other potential disasters of current social interest?
Reddit, an odd conglomeration of people and topics, represents, like TikTok or X or Instagram, et al. what is currently the "mind-set" of many people, and that is rather sad.
Also, I see some of my UFO pals -- Kevin Rande, Tanner Boyle, and my Facebook cronies -- locked into past UFO accounts and stories many of us have moved on from.
(My YouTube inserts and mouldering UFO tales are almost as bad but I try to include that which has a relevance to the UFO expla- nation, which I'm guessing affects those locked into them.)
The "problem" for Ufology is that old UFO accounts that have already received heady rumination are tiring, boring, or just meaningless drivel.
Reddit's daily (hourly?) UFO/UAP input is, generally, current and on point, even when it's loopy. The input comes from UFO newbies mostly -- the UAP crowd, whereas X derives commentary from UFO oldies and sometimes notables.
My point here is that UFOs are now in a new realm, only smothered by those still hanging on to the "disclosure" nonsense.
There is a subtext to UFOs now -- even in its UAP "disguise": the phenomenon represents a danger to humanity. not just the national security.
Kevin Randle's Levelland microwave dangers for those in a UFO presence is offset by the UFO predilection for human or animal body parts.
Tanner Boyle's reminiscences of past oddball persons inhabiting UFO lore may be interesting to some but irrelevant and a sidebar to what UFOs really portend.
Reddit is where the UFO/UAP mind is right now -- in that Chris Lehto realm of a topic that brings attention to podcasters, You- Tubers, and the like, plus a few dollars from gullible UAP followers and those with a few bucks to waste.
Here, at this blog -- aside from my diligent pal Ron -- one can see the apathy of long-timers, geezers some. and those who once found UFOs (flying saucers) psychically exciting.
My (few) readers may be likened to those who reside within the memory of that long-ago excitement about the phenomenon, an excitement that is being squashed by the "cover-up" hoopla in place, once again.
Fortunately, I am quieted by the newbies I've discovered hovering at Reddit (or TikTok) and the insertion of daily news about the Webb telescope -- news that is upsetting the errant cosmic blather (Big Bang theory, etc,) that marred my long-ago entry into Astrophysics.
Aside from that, AI is vibrant as a topic and the insanity of Trump and his MAGA radicals allows for a respite from the "bucket list" crowd that thinks life is meant for vacation trips or indulging their grandkids.
Thank God for the intellectual respite that one gets from among a few millennial thinkers, hiding in plain view.
None showing up here...
RR
Copyright 2024, AI-America
According to that New Yorker AI piece [March 18, Page 42 ff.] about the pro-anti AI groups -- interesting but out of the real AI loop -- I hope readers took note of the quantum techies involved in the AI squabbles.
There are rather private side-bars in the AI discourse, among those on the periphery of the matter and development of the currently hot topic.
Many quantum AI "researchers" are wild about AI sentience, with a (very) few taking up time with a discussion that I like: AI "emotional" and "spiritual evolvement, hinting at an AI "soul."
Because the quantum observer (measurer) brings about a quantum reality, it appears, as some think, that importing AI with quantum, observation or input, AI shall end up not only having transience but also moral and ethical contingencies hovering not only in the background but eventually as a more than transient element of what AI is or becomes.
This means that AI will have a technical machine existence along- side its observer's mental and "spiritual" proclivities, if any.
My argument about AI sentience gets me in trouble with the techies -- almost all of them. And now a "spiritual" assertion or possibility will get me tossed from the AI groups I'm part of.
But there are palpable arguments for the actuality of an AI soul (or whatever term ends up suggesting the same).
Those arguments can be fleshed out and unmarginalized by appli- cation of quantum theory.
More to come on this -- maybe not here but at my AI blog and whatever happens if I try to open the door to such a view else- where in my AI domain(s).
(Image atop from LinkedIn)
RR
I received a note telling me that I should be ready to discuss items. during the xAI online gathering Saturday, 3/23, from the New Yorker , March 18th, piece O.K., Doomer by Andrew Marantz.
I found my NY copy and, there on Page 42 begins a rather thorough piece about, as far as I can tell from a skim of the article this morning, the current "rift" between "AI doomesrists" [P(doom)] and "techno-opti- mists" [e-acks]. There are other terms describing both camps, but I'm barely awake this morning so I'll comment further after I high- light the piece and hear what the Muskers have to say this weekend.
You know my AI thinking: AI has sentience already and will be fully sentient [A.G.I.] sooner than later.
Anyone reading this -- persons with actual AI-like sentience, not the bloopershit coming my way about UFO/UAP stuff -- please leave comments. I could use some "down-to-earth" repertoire if called upon Saturday for input. (I have a reputation for goofiness because of my Academia.edu paper on AI Sentience.]
I think and hope that AI does eliminate humanity eventually, as this planet is filled with our ignorant, harmful species to the point that human beings cannot (should not) be scattering its defective genes all over the galaxy or Universe (someday).
RR
Copyright 2024, AI-America
The planet Earth is a unique place -- for its inhabitants, and only its inhabitants.
In a context of our galaxy, The Milkyway, and more so, the Universe in its complex infinity, the Earth is a pathe- tic, little blob of nothingness.
For those insinuating that Earth is a beacon for possible sentient travelers, from "civi- lizations" far and away in the spectacular vastness of that infinity is an ignorant madness.
We who try to be rational have to cease catering to those mentally blind UFO/UAP apes.
Commentary, podcastings, blogging, websites, books et cetera catered by them have to be ignored, placed on a bulletin board noting them as intellectually deficient and Earth-centric ignoramuses.
Those UFO people smothering X, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, blogs and podcasts with their insane drivel have got to be shut down, if we thinking types hope to come to a UFO/UAP consensus that makes sense.
I know a raft of former UFO notables who've resigned from the UFO dialogue. And while I sympathize with their enlightened decision to go AWOL, I'm distressed to lose their insights and thought processes.
But I'm part of the problem, inputting comments and my own ragged postings online here.
I'll try to contain my zeal for dopey input, and by some who use this platform for silly, long-withered ideas about UFOs and their possible creators or users.
Enough is enough.
RR
Copyright 2024, AI-America
I've long hoped that if UFOs are gathered, in any redeemable way, and contain sentient entities, that we humans might get a chance to ask questions those entities might have insights about, such as:
What are the realities of the Universe -- its origin (if there is one), its extension (as to what lies outside it), are there multiple versions, and so on?
Is there an intelligent force (that we humans call God) responsible for existence (reality)?
And dozens of other inquiries that take up our scientific and philo- sophical thinking...
But it seems, as far as can be determined by flying saucer sightings and alleged encounters, that UFOs have an obsession only with this planet and its flora and fauna.
The apparent nuclear facility visitations indicate an obsession with atomic fission or weaponry, even though such developments would have no bearing on an extraterrestrial civilization even as nearby as any might be in our solar system, let alone one light years away.
Nope, UFO concerns are pathological, if the accounts of what their interests seem to be are accurate.
Discernable UFO attentions lie only within the aspects of this planet and its inhabitants or natural environs -- to the point that the appellation of "advanced intelligence" within UFO configurations is really a rough, ignorant projection by human beings.
I don't think we're going to get any worthwhile information or pro- found insights from UFO "occupants" if some apparent encounters and experiences are true or actual.
God help us if the "evidence" of UFO contact bears any resem- blance to the UFOers obsession(s).
(Image atop from Thoughtful Learning)
RR
https://youtu.be/EDoWmddwY3o?si=B_IXfe1-7rXOURp9
I had to come back to Fort Wayne, for a dental appointment this past week -- a chipped tooth -- and I left Ann Arbor with some regret....
While I'm 47 miles north of the city, at my lake home, my news media connections intrude: changes to the local media market force me to concede that people in Fort Wayne are not, by a long shot, very bright or consumed by serious happenings in the world-at-large or anything with a cultural scent.
Also, I needed to nab my Cosmic Consciousness book (by Bucke). There's a round table on the topic this coming week at Ann Arbor.
I'll note the substance of that gathering upcoming.
Then there's this: Zach, of my AA gang, has got his podcast going. It's geared to area college Freshies and Sophs. ID cards are needed to get access info.
While I underwrote his expenses, he asked me to refrain from promoting the cast, especially here at this blog. (It seems we, me included, are not grist for his topics -- UAP and related areas. I understand where he's coming from with that.)
But I did listen to the first two installments via Rumble and the content was lofty and fresh, more intellectually zealous than other like podcasts about the topic or what I input here.
So, with my new obsession about coffee, and how to variously brew it, I'll try to push some interesting stuff forward here. It won't be zippy, like Zach's or his followers, but it'll be fine for us long-timers.
RRTony Bragalia brings to my attention that UAP whistle-blower, David Grusch, went out of his way to talk with Tom DeLonge at a recent Blink-182 tour concert -- Grusch finding his way backstage to see DeLonge.
Why?
If Grusch is as smart as some think he is, why does he keep mingling with the UAP dregs and fakers: DeLonge, Corbell, Knapp, podcasters seeking attention not truth, et al.?
This makes Grusch iffy for me (and Bragalia, among others).
A man is known by the company he keeps, yes?
RR
https://youtu.be/HrtkQaLpmEc?si=VIvXjO4Be5U-lJu7
This is a full-length video documentary by our long-time pal, film-maker, ghost-hunter Paul Kimball, who is laid back about UFOs (and UAP) lately, sometimes commenting here and showing his vittles on Facebook.https://youtu.be/7w_t9Z4hPbU?si=eCImz4oFXWMQt50U
https://youtu.be/xK5toSBqbPY?si=3xVTdL4ZIn9Bwe-K
This is a lengthy, oddly horrifying video about UFOs and human mutilations, with graphic and actual photos of those mutilations.https://youtu.be/UVPs-2DfN_o?si=anTeMkmmJfpkP8pS
Ross Coulthart's NewsNation program, this video blustery, smarmy, and aggrieved about the AARO prevarication.For instance, while Google's UFO Alerts have succumbed in the past few days [3/9 and 3/10] to linking the media renditions about the AARO conclusionary report that UFOs, er, UAP, are not extraterrestrial thingies, UFO/UAP prone persons, podcasts, blogs, news media, too, have taken to relating that same refrain.
(The report did not accent the Grusch "disclosure" that UAP was of a non-human nature, AARO sticking to the ET theme,)
Then, on Sunday, after ignoring YouTube's notifications, this weekend, about new UFO/UAP videos, I receive, in my email, Bryan Sentes' latest blog entry -- https://skunkworksblog.com/2024/03/10/on-the-latest-crest-of-the-psychic-tide/ -- wherein Bryan ruminates on the current state of UFO thinking among the academic "elite" -- Kripal, Cutchin, Engels, Gadamer, Vallee, and Whitley Strieber.
Strieber? Has Sentes been taken in by the Strieber nonsense and con?
This is the kind of thing that took me away from my "friendship" with Sentes: he is "mad" with ideas that belie sense -- common sense and rational thinking, outside the academic milieu where a different kind of madness than the UFO madness prevails.
Sentes and the whole raft of YouTuber's feigning a kind of academic atmosphere in their videos -- my "pal" Jesse Michels among them -- like to play at being scholarly, going off-topic to bring in every possible suggestion that UFOs/UAP are something more than craft from somewhere else in our reality, lately the spiritual realm of angels and demons or, in Sentes case, the paranormal fringe where Blavatsky and her like resided.
And while the philosophical, metaphysical, Big Bang losers, and other academic or scientific mavens are locked in their disciplines -- interesting as those areas of scholarly realms may be -- UFOs (and UAP) are not of that ilk.
The phenomenon is not paranormal! It consists of a non-human solidity from time, another dimension, another abutting universe, or even somewhere extraterrestrial. But it is not ethereally connected to our reality, or its so-called fringe ultra-normal reality that impinges on us now and then.
So, Sentes and his obdurate cronies are all wet, and striving to survive in their musty academic arena by latching onto the UFO phenomenon, where all the action is at the moment.
There's nothing sadder than a scholar lost in the welter of academic nonsense, or trying to escape it as Sentes' buddy Mike Cifone or the slipping into UFO fandom as Diana Pasulka is.
UFOs (and its UAP counterpart) are things outside the mad minds of its followers and mavens, even the UFO long-timers who are lost and outside the topic nowadays.
UFOs (flying saucers, UAP, whatever) are a phenomenon unique and solid, something to contend with in ways separate from the norms that humanity keeps trying to smother it with.
(The image atop is from https://isha.sadhguru.org/en/wisdom/article/managing-the-madness)
RR
https://youtu.be/pBTWosraq2U?si=mjB1JyzG6r_ePvCG
What a mess UFOs are in....
RR
https://youtu.be/tS_64sTN5AU?si=zzT69dcAEjVgLn-x
Jesse Michels hosts Diana Pasulka -- two brilliant persons, she, a scholar and he, well-read.https://youtu.be/8o6s217gO7w?si=M9Keen3vZbGTvgDe
Tony B sent the PDF report:
https://youtu.be/SVtzitdGvs0?si=0l2dr2G5UvifdIW1
This is one of the finest and best examples of what a real UFO researcher does and should do.https://youtu.be/UXPxWgqYEqo?si=TtrS82ZtLFj10PIM
https://youtu.be/lIsQMJc7GhU?si=dFIGNbanVDL4a8rQ
https://youtu.be/9AmvOoC2TM0?si=L6-w4jzU6ekj8Mrd